Zoo Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Have a go and answer; What would you do in these situations? Edited February 11, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 1. Wait 2. Indirect fk 3. Ask their mum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) 3. Ask their mum The striker could be given a card though because he's left the field without your (the referee's) permission. Edited February 11, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 12, 2013 Report Share Posted February 12, 2013 Have a go and answer; What would you do in these situations? I think, "Use common sense and do what you think is best" should be the answer to all three....the rule book can't cover everything or it'd be ridiculous. Law 5,239 Paragraph 7 Subsection 6. What to do if a spaceship lands on the pitch whilst an indirect free kick is being taken by the home team on the opposition six yard line when the spaceship doesn't impede line of sight to the goal and the aliens aren't zapping the away bench with laser guns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalziel Kane Posted February 12, 2013 Report Share Posted February 12, 2013 Aliens don't have ray guns or lasers. That's a misconception. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted February 12, 2013 Report Share Posted February 12, 2013 Aliens don't have ray guns or lasers. That's a misconception. How would you know? Or are you admitting what we've all suspected, that you're an alien? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 12, 2013 Report Share Posted February 12, 2013 How would you know? And anyway, it's covered in.... Law 5,239 Paragraph 7 Subsection 6. Ammendment 39b In the event that the the alien use of laser guns is a misconception blah blah..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 17, 2013 Report Share Posted February 17, 2013 Have a go and answer; What would you do in these situations? Are we going to get answers to this Zoo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 17, 2013 Report Share Posted February 17, 2013 1st one, id delay for a bit but then hand the ball to the keeper. pretty sure 2 is an indirect freekick, as the player isnt fully kitted. In what world is the 3rd one ever going to happen!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2013 Are we going to get answers to this Zoo? Nobody answered so I didn't think anyone had interest, I'll post another one tonight/tomorrow and save the answers so that I can give feedback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 17, 2013 Report Share Posted February 17, 2013 Nobody answered so I didn't think anyone had interest, I'll post another one tonight/tomorrow and save the answers so that I can give feedback. youve had a few answers so far as I can see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) Sorry for not answering the last question, I didn't think anyone had an interest in it. If this gets enough attention I can do this every day or week alongside my quiz. I've got the answers to this picture too, so you can answer knowing that I'll get back to you. Edited March 4, 2013 by Zoo Matt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubecula Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 1, no action. It is something they must live with. It wasn't deliberate. 2. No action, how a club runs itself is no concern of yours. If the ne man is banned for some reason, then you can ask for him to be taken out of the equation, otherwise none of your affair. 3. Dixie would spin in his grave. It was either in the goalies control (two hands) or not. In the goalies control it is a foul. other wise it is a goal. Zoo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 1. Send the player to the side of the pitch to put his boot back on 2. Intervene, assistant manager or coach already in the dug out to take over. 3. Give the goal. Zoo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 Answers: 1) There is no offence here: the unattached boot may have denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity, but it was a fluke: it was not thrown, so there is no infringement to deal with. The boot did, though, interfere with play like any other "outside agent", so you need to stop the game and restart with a dropped ball. 2) Yes, you need to act – not over the undignified sacking, but over the use of electronic communication systems between players and staff. Get a message to the new manager requesting him to stop – and reminding him he cannot enter the technical area either, as his name is not on the team sheet. Afterwards, include what happened in your report. 3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team. -Keith Hackett. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 18, 2013 Report Share Posted February 18, 2013 3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team. Shit....that means we only won the '84 Cup Final 1-0! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) Remember Nat Lofthouse shoulder charging the Goalie (who had the ball in his grasp) into the net for a Goal. A bit before Andy Grays Watford goal. Edited February 19, 2013 by Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) I always thought that the goalkeeper had to have two hands on the ball for it to be in his 'control'. I guess the rules might have changed since then as most people have said memorable goals have been scored in a similar way. Edited March 4, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Answers: 1) There is no offence here: the unattached boot may have denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity, but it was a fluke: it was not thrown, so there is no infringement to deal with. The boot did, though, interfere with play like any other "outside agent", so you need to stop the game and restart with a dropped ball. 2) Yes, you need to act – not over the undignified sacking, but over the use of electronic communication systems between players and staff. Get a message to the new manager requesting him to stop – and reminding him he cannot enter the technical area either, as his name is not on the team sheet. Afterwards, include what happened in your report. 3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team. -Keith Hackett. that is insane... so if the ball is touchin the keepers head whilst he in on the ground, hes in control and you cant challenge for it?! Not aimed at you Zoo, just amazed at the amount of bullshit in the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) I always thought that the goalkeeper had to have two hands on the ball for it to be in his 'control'. I guess the rules might have changed since then as most people have said memorable goals have been scored in a similar way. 1. do nothing but report the club after the game maybe2. obstruction surely? disallow the goal and free kick to defending team 3. no goal, drop ball. I like these Edited February 19, 2013 by Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 1. Tell the goalie and striker to discard the announcer's advice. Report the club. 2. Agree with Matt's answer. 3. Re-take the fk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcus jones Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Same as pete except No3 goal allowed as first offence takes priority? Does in Rugby Union anyway................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Answers: 1) You cannot intervene here during the game: the kick has to be taken, whatever anyone in the stadium is shouting. Calm everyone down and allow the kick to go ahead, but before restarting the game advise the home team's officials that the incident will be reported, and that they need to make sure there is no repeat. 2) No. The striker might very well have been trying to avoid injury, but whatever his reasons, he is guilty of pushing an opponent. Restart the game with a direct free-kick to the defending team. 3) Strictly, if two opponents commit offences of the same nature simultaneously, you are supposed to stop play, take any necessary disciplinary action (such as a yellow card for unsporting behaviour), and restart with a dropped ball. But in practice, it is better to be decisive and make a judgment: penalise one of the offences and look confident in doing so. The defender cannot be penalised for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity as the ball ended up in the net – so penalise the second attacker for holding down the defender in order to score. It's a direct free-kick to the defending side. Edited February 20, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 That third rule is ridiculous. I don't see how that second part can be considered fair, but explains why refs are arrogant cocks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) It shows where some of the mad decisions come from. Edited March 4, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 1. Nothing. 2. Not until after the fk, then give a foul for obstruction if the players continue to obstruct. 3. No goal, the player should wait for the ref's permission to come back on the pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 3. No goal, the player should wait for the ref's permission to come back on the pitch. Players run off the pitch all the time and don't need permission to come back on....that's only if you're off for treatment surely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Time for some more answers, hope everyone is still enjoying this. 1) There's nothing you can do about the pitch dimensions as the match is under way. So treat this as you would if the ball struck any other outside agent: stop play and restart with a dropped ball directly beneath where it hit the roof. 2) No. This is perfectly legal. Players can stand anywhere on the field of play: the only criterion is that the defending players must be at least 9.15m from the ball. But clearly you need to keep an eye on what happens next: it is a potential flashpoint. 3) No. The winger did nothing wrong by leaving the pitch without permission because it was a normal part of a move. But when the ball is then played back towards him by a team-mate while he remains off the field, you must treat his position as though he was standing on the touchline itself. So he was effectively in an offside position, and became actively involved when he received and played the ball. The defender's movement is irrelevant. Disallow the goal, and restart with a free-kick. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Time for some more answers, hope everyone is still enjoying this. 1) There's nothing you can do about the pitch dimensions as the match is under way. So treat this as you would if the ball struck any other outside agent: stop play and restart with a dropped ball directly beneath where it hit the roof. 2) No. This is perfectly legal. Players can stand anywhere on the field of play: the only criterion is that the defending players must be at least 9.15m from the ball. But clearly you need to keep an eye on what happens next: it is a potential flashpoint. 3) No. The winger did nothing wrong by leaving the pitch without permission because it was a normal part of a move. But when the ball is then played back towards him by a team-mate while he remains off the field, you must treat his position as though he was standing on the touchline itself. So he was effectively in an offside position, and became actively involved when he received and played the ball. The defender's movement is irrelevant. Disallow the goal, and restart with a free-kick. . I really am, keep them coming! I assume the people who do the art work are Everton fans? pete0 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted February 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2013 (edited) It's back. This time with good ol' Alan Pardew. Edited March 4, 2013 by Zoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.