Jump to content
IGNORED

Refereeing Quiz...


Zoo

Recommended Posts

Tim-Howard-003.jpg

Have a go and answer; What would you do in these situations?

 

I think, "Use common sense and do what you think is best" should be the answer to all three....the rule book can't cover everything or it'd be ridiculous.

 

Law 5,239 Paragraph 7 Subsection 6.

What to do if a spaceship lands on the pitch whilst an indirect free kick is being taken by the home team on the opposition six yard line when the spaceship doesn't impede line of sight to the goal and the aliens aren't zapping the away bench with laser guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for not answering the last question, I didn't think anyone had an interest in it. If this gets enough attention I can do this every day or week alongside my quiz. I've got the answers to this picture too, so you can answer knowing that I'll get back to you.

 

225_zps7d1fc3ed.jpg

Edited by Zoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1, no action. It is something they must live with. It wasn't deliberate.

2. No action, how a club runs itself is no concern of yours. If the ne man is banned for some reason, then you can ask for him to be taken out of the equation, otherwise none of your affair.

3. Dixie would spin in his grave. It was either in the goalies control (two hands) or not. In the goalies control it is a foul. other wise it is a goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answers:

 

1) There is no offence here: the unattached boot may have denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity, but it was a fluke: it was not thrown, so there is no infringement to deal with. The boot did, though, interfere with play like any other "outside agent", so you need to stop the game and restart with a dropped ball.

 

2) Yes, you need to act – not over the undignified sacking, but over the use of electronic communication systems between players and staff. Get a message to the new manager requesting him to stop – and reminding him he cannot enter the technical area either, as his name is not on the team sheet. Afterwards, include what happened in your report.

 

3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team.

 

-Keith Hackett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team.

 

Shit....that means we only won the '84 Cup Final 1-0!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought that the goalkeeper had to have two hands on the ball for it to be in his 'control'. I guess the rules might have changed since then as most people have said memorable goals have been scored in a similar way.

 

224_zps50fc1bd8.jpg

Edited by Zoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answers:

 

1) There is no offence here: the unattached boot may have denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity, but it was a fluke: it was not thrown, so there is no infringement to deal with. The boot did, though, interfere with play like any other "outside agent", so you need to stop the game and restart with a dropped ball.

 

2) Yes, you need to act – not over the undignified sacking, but over the use of electronic communication systems between players and staff. Get a message to the new manager requesting him to stop – and reminding him he cannot enter the technical area either, as his name is not on the team sheet. Afterwards, include what happened in your report.

 

3) The striker has not made contact with the goalkeeper, but he is guilty of an offence. The Law states: "The goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms" – so you need to penalise the striker's challenge. Disallow the goal and restart play with a direct free-kick to the defending team.

 

-Keith Hackett.

that is insane... so if the ball is touchin the keepers head whilst he in on the ground, hes in control and you cant challenge for it?!

 

Not aimed at you Zoo, just amazed at the amount of bullshit in the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought that the goalkeeper had to have two hands on the ball for it to be in his 'control'. I guess the rules might have changed since then as most people have said memorable goals have been scored in a similar way.

 

224_zps50fc1bd8.jpg

1. do nothing but report the club after the game maybe

2. obstruction surely? disallow the goal and free kick to defending team

3. no goal, drop ball.

 

I like these :)

Edited by Matt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Answers:

 

1) You cannot intervene here during the game: the kick has to be taken, whatever anyone in the stadium is shouting. Calm everyone down and allow the kick to go ahead, but before restarting the game advise the home team's officials that the incident will be reported, and that they need to make sure there is no repeat.

 

2) No. The striker might very well have been trying to avoid injury, but whatever his reasons, he is guilty of pushing an opponent. Restart the game with a direct free-kick to the defending team.

 

3) Strictly, if two opponents commit offences of the same nature simultaneously, you are supposed to stop play, take any necessary disciplinary action (such as a yellow card for unsporting behaviour), and restart with a dropped ball. But in practice, it is better to be decisive and make a judgment: penalise one of the offences and look confident in doing so. The defender cannot be penalised for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity as the ball ended up in the net – so penalise the second attacker for holding down the defender in order to score. It's a direct free-kick to the defending side.

Edited by Zoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time for some more answers, hope everyone is still enjoying this.

 

1) There's nothing you can do about the pitch dimensions as the match is under way. So treat this as you would if the ball struck any other outside agent: stop play and restart with a dropped ball directly beneath where it hit the roof.

 

2) No. This is perfectly legal. Players can stand anywhere on the field of play: the only criterion is that the defending players must be at least 9.15m from the ball. But clearly you need to keep an eye on what happens next: it is a potential flashpoint.

 

3) No. The winger did nothing wrong by leaving the pitch without permission because it was a normal part of a move. But when the ball is then played back towards him by a team-mate while he remains off the field, you must treat his position as though he was standing on the touchline itself. So he was effectively in an offside position, and became actively involved when he received and played the ball. The defender's movement is irrelevant. Disallow the goal, and restart with a free-kick.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time for some more answers, hope everyone is still enjoying this.

 

1) There's nothing you can do about the pitch dimensions as the match is under way. So treat this as you would if the ball struck any other outside agent: stop play and restart with a dropped ball directly beneath where it hit the roof.

 

2) No. This is perfectly legal. Players can stand anywhere on the field of play: the only criterion is that the defending players must be at least 9.15m from the ball. But clearly you need to keep an eye on what happens next: it is a potential flashpoint.

 

3) No. The winger did nothing wrong by leaving the pitch without permission because it was a normal part of a move. But when the ball is then played back towards him by a team-mate while he remains off the field, you must treat his position as though he was standing on the touchline itself. So he was effectively in an offside position, and became actively involved when he received and played the ball. The defender's movement is irrelevant. Disallow the goal, and restart with a free-kick.

.

I really am, keep them coming! I assume the people who do the art work are Everton fans?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...