robin.jones Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 manny on loan from valencia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue 250 Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 YES!......He's like most players, always looking for more money/a better deal.If he could do a job for us then yes get him in!We know what he can do, he could help us win a cup or finish top six. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRS_LUvs_da_Blues Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 He had his chance, didn't want to take it, so fuck him!!! He ain't a player who will play for the shirt or whatever he is a doll used & abused by his agents we don't need setups like that!! anyway if we had of got him we wouldn't have got Peanuts & he is getting better every game, so a big NO from me!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldfishMemory Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 Definatly he was a pawn in a 'bigger' game in the summer and anyone who holds that against him can't tell their arse from their elbow IMO! The problem is if we bring him in we wont bring in a permenant centre mid which we need so are Everton willing to stump up the 12mil for him at the end of the season??? Also are we allowed anymore loans after Tommy & Piennar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I can see Pienaar signing permanent so it won't be a problem if it is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everton_Worshiper Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 yes I would take him, would be a valuable asset to our club...not his fault his advisors are t0sser5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin.jones Posted November 19, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I agree SP will be here on a perm deal either in jan or in the summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I'd definitely take him back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue4Ever Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 Definatly he was a pawn in a 'bigger' game in the summer and anyone who holds that against him can't tell their arse from their elbow IMO! The problem is if we bring him in we wont bring in a permenant centre mid which we need so are Everton willing to stump up the 12mil for him at the end of the season??? Also are we allowed anymore loans after Tommy & Piennar? Were allowed 4 players on season long loans I think, so yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraccerC Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 daft if you wouldn't idont blame him at all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmb08 Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I'd take him without a second thought - quality is quality is quality at the end of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 as said above, quality is quality, and we know this lad has it in abundance! wasnt his fault he didnt sign for us, the blame lies alot closer to home Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue4Ever Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I think his agent had a very big part in him joining Valencia, I cant remeber him playing for them yet, think ive seen him play once for them, isnt the manager of valencia now the old benfica manager he fell out in the first place? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randomness Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 ronald koeman aye. if he wants back, i would take him. not his fault global sports watever wanted to keep thier 50% of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raccyboy Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 not for me, he can f*ck off - not all the blame lies with the agents Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFCfanatic Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 No. Keep your options open is fine. But to agree a deal with the club and then fuck off and switch off your phone??? prat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 how the hell do you know he switched off his phone? bill kenwrights best mates uncle tell a friend of a friend! in these 3rd party deals they work for the agent, the agent tells them where they go. if he wanted to put his foot down and stay at everton he would have had to buy himself out of the contract, and that will be a water tight contract of slaven bilic proportions! and for anybody who didnt notice, we had manny here in january! it took until august for him to sign for valencia! the blame lie somewhere between BK KW and DM. or as the clubs "financial sources" had leaked, everton only loaned enough money to buy EITHER yak or manny, not both! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calico Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Would he be happy leaving sunny Spain for here, though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFCfanatic Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 how the hell do you know he switched off his phone? bill kenwrights best mates uncle tell a friend of a friend! in these 3rd party deals they work for the agent, the agent tells them where they go. if he wanted to put his foot down and stay at everton he would have had to buy himself out of the contract, and that will be a water tight contract of slaven bilic proportions! and for anybody who didnt notice, we had manny here in january! it took until august for him to sign for valencia! the blame lie somewhere between BK KW and DM. or as the clubs "financial sources" had leaked, everton only loaned enough money to buy EITHER yak or manny, not both! Phone or no phone I don't care. Would not want him. I don't see any loyalty in him. Thats not just because of what happened with us. My opinion. The END! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraccerC Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 i blame the club and the fa not manny, not valencia, not benfica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 If loyalty is a basis of acceptance @ any club in this day & age, then the modern supporter is wide open to be nothing more than disapointed & Regulary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 (edited) Phone or no phone I don't care. Would not want him. I don't see any loyalty in him. Thats not just because of what happened with us. My opinion. The END! lol wooooo!!! i have in my hand some underwear, they seem quite twisted, pretty sure they belong to you! calm down lad to talk about a footballer an loyalty in the same breath is like talking about michael schumacher on the front row for France in the rugby world cup! Edited November 21, 2007 by StevO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Reg Reagan Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 nope... there are better players than him im front of him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everton_Worshiper Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 wooooo!!! i have in my hand some underwear, they seem quite twisted, pretty sure they belong to you! calm down lad to talk about a footballer an loyalty in the same breath is like talking about michael schumacher on the front row for France in the rugby world cup! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFCfanatic Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 wooooo!!! i have in my hand some underwear, they seem quite twisted, pretty sure they belong to you! calm down lad to talk about a footballer an loyalty in the same breath is like talking about michael schumacher on the front row for France in the rugby world cup! Lmao. All's calm at my end pal don't worry. Was not best pleased when he went 2 Valencia obviously. Maybe ur right bout loyalty. Not my best choice of words. Just wudnt want him big smiles! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 (edited) maybe we should get schumacher in? ive seen that fella in the charity games, looked handy! edit: p.s. glad you took that the right way, could have easily been taken nasty Edited November 21, 2007 by StevO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Posted November 22, 2007 Report Share Posted November 22, 2007 See Shuey on Casey stoners Ducatti @ testing trials last week ? A couple of laps & Michael was but 5 secs of the circuit record & his better times would have qualified him @ last yeras race ( Jerez I thinks) . Now thats not bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted November 22, 2007 Report Share Posted November 22, 2007 to be blunt, Schumacher is a sports man of the highest order, he is first an foremost an athlete, then puts himself into what ever code he fancies, and tends to hold his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.