Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 15/01/20 in all areas
-
Another terrible analogy from you, because you assume that just because the rules are in place then they are followed at all times.3 points
-
Imagine being that handsome and that good at football.... no I wasn't talking about Michael Keane.2 points
-
Tingle down the spine never goes away!2 points
-
André Gomes
Hafnia reacted to Finn balor for a topic
Hafs got a point. On top of that he’s a top guy with a gentle hug1 point -
I think you might find it works different to that, we paid say £25 million for Schneiderlin in the years he’s been here has his value as a club asset decreased or increased as entered in last years accounts, a players wage has nothing to do with his value, all wages go down as over head cost to the business.1 point
-
Video replay/VAR opinions
Palfy reacted to markjazzbassist for a topic
now wolves losing. this is a shambles, United gifted this game thanks to VAR1 point -
Well i think that's appreciation, my friend.1 point
-
A player like that is a gold mine for a club as their asset price would depreciate, where the player may grow in value. I suspose it’s like you selling yourself as a self employed person to your own limited company.1 point
-
No, of course I don't advocate cheating, but according to your responses you pretend it's not possible. Your analogy is garbage. Edit: you're a politicians' dream.1 point
-
Haf have a cold shower mate you’re getting far to excited1 point
-
Board/Owners Related Stuff
markjazzbassist reacted to Shukes for a topic
Player value depreciates as any business asset does. Sponsorships are your main source of income, as its pure profit. Player sales are always going to be subsidised with squad budget.1 point -
Sorry to hear Mike, I'd noticed you hadn't been north this season.1 point
-
Churchill’s quote still rings true today democracy is a process, democracy doesn’t mean every decision voted on has to be upheld in the minds and actions of everyone. We, well not all of us live in a country where we have freedom of speech were the minority has a right to challenge the majority, were we are allowed to challenge the people we put in positions of power. Not to be able to do theses things is not a democratic society or a democracy, it would be an authoritarian state, and what Churchill refers to in his speech, is the sacrifices people have given for us to enjoy freedom, against the alternative of at the time the Nazi state. He was definitely not advocating that you have to accept every decision voted on and won that you don’t agree with, more to the contrary he was saying you have the freedom to argue against decisions you don’t agree with. You could go to these Middle East countries and have no freedom of speech and be a shadow of your former self, that’s entirely your choice. But would Churchill be happy that British national’s were in someways helping to legitimise and prop up regimes that have some of the worse human rights in the world, that offer you no freedom of speech, that offer you no say in how or who leads the country, that’s no way to respect or remember the people who Churchill was referring to, the ones who gave up there lives for world freedom in a world war, many people on here show them respect by using there freedom of speech, and I for one thank them for that because that is what they gave there lives up for freedom.1 point
-
General Election/UK Politics
Palfy reacted to London Blue for a topic
Only because Trump ripped it up. Until then it was limiting Iran's Nuclear ambitions, allowing regular inspections and calming fears of nucular proliferation in the region.Not perfect but doing what it was designed to do.1 point -
January Transfer Window
Romey 1878 reacted to London Blue for a topic
"There's a sucker born every minute"1 point -
Longest Thread! for Everton Discussion
Shukes reacted to markjazzbassist for a topic
As to be expected. Positive is the net debt is down to 9m now. In the bill days it was mortgaged to the hilt. Glad it’s super low now. Granted it’s moshiri loans but he’s the owner so he’s invested.1 point -
1 point
-
Democracy is not a perfect system. Someone who blindly follows the government just because it is labeled a certain way really doesn't understand the inherent nature of mankind.1 point
-
1 point
-
Blue Bill's shiny new stadium at the docks...
markjazzbassist reacted to Newty82 for a topic
Usmanov has paid £30million just for the naming contract rights...then he'll pay stupid money for the actual naming rights. No coincidence this is announced at the same time as we reveal accounts with a £118mill loss. Clever bastards these lot.1 point -
Blue Bill's shiny new stadium at the docks...
markjazzbassist reacted to Finn balor for a topic
Alan Myers has tweeted the £30 mill is just for usmanov to get to the front of the queue to bid for the naming rights. Let’s be real folks usmanov is our sugar daddy1 point -
Twitter Transfer Rumours
chicagoblue reacted to barryj for a topic
All tongue in cheek and if you can laugh at yourselves quite apt!1 point -
There is something special about night games, the park end from outside looks fantastic1 point
-
Two out of two. It was Premier League home clean sheets. If he does a big Sam he’ll claim the Arsenal one as well because he was in the ground ........I think he’s probably got more class though.1 point
-
1 point
-
Board/Owners Related Stuff
London Blue reacted to Romey 1878 for a topic
Be good to get him officially involved so he can really start pumping in the money in a big way. Moshiri has probably just been face of Usmanov from the get go.1 point