Jump to content

Cornish Steve

Members
  • Posts

    11,735
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Posts posted by Cornish Steve

  1. 2 hours ago, Elston Gunnn said:

    Not sure what to make of this, but it’s somewhere between weird and suspicious.  This BBC Sport article says the VAR ref was Michael Salisbury, not Pawson.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67892373

    In a Sky News article: "But after Craig Pawson, the VAR, reviewed the images which showed Calvert-Lewin clipping Clyne's shin with his studs, Kavanagh was summoned to the monitor. After re-watching the incident multiple times, including in slow motion, a red card was issued. Everton have since appealed the decision."

    Yahoo Sports claims Salisbury was the VAR referee.

    Shields Gazette: "
    Referee Craig Pawson was involved in a controversial VAR decision during Everton's FA Cup match against Crystal Palace - just two days before he'll officiate Sunderland's huge fixture against Newcastle. Pawson was the VAR official who recommended that on-field referee Chris Kavanagh visited the pitchside monitor after a tackle from Everton striker Dominic Calvert-Lewin, before the player was shown a straight red card in the 79th minute."

    The Sportsmole: "Everton have lodged an appeal against the red card received by Dominic Calvert-Lewin in the club's FA Cup third round tie with Crystal Palace on Thursday. The striker was sent off with just over 10 minutes remaining of the 0-0 draw at Selhurst Park, following a VAR review recommended by Craig Pawson."

    Total confusion reigns. Is this genuine misinformation or deliberate obfuscation?

    PS - Just to add to the confusion, it seems that Yahoo Sports has now edited out the name 'Michael Salisbury' from the article I read not 30 minutes ago.

  2. 2 hours ago, Tonsta said:

    I don't think this is anything to do with Kavanagh,he did not even give a foul,  its 100% Pawson.

    On one sports show, Neil Warnock quoted other examples and made the explicit claim that Pawson has it in for Everton. But what would the motive be? Did we not send him a Christmas card?

  3. 1 hour ago, Haiku said:

    Nobody can convince me that there isn't an agenda against Everton.

    One day, it's all going to come out. There's no doubt VAR is being used to rig results, no doubt at all. The league's defence will be that football is no different from wrestling - it's entertainment, and they can rig it however they like - but that's not how fans see it. We demand honesty, fairness, and a single standard that's applied to all. The FA has it in for Everton, no doubt, and we've almost reached the point where an independent inquiry should be convened.

    And if the FA wants to show me a red card for writing that, then "go ahead - make my day!"

  4. When you have a rather thin squad, you have no option but to build a strategy around specific players. There's no doubt that Doucoure is central to our approach right now, so it's not so surprising that we've struggled a little. Still, there were always going to be bumps in the road. What matters is the long haul.

  5. 4 hours ago, Hafnia said:

    Happy to not do any business in January.  Squad very settled, maybe left back cover needed 

    Our problem is depth of squad. This season, we've been more fortunate than in previous years with comparatively few injuries. Recent games have revealed we can survive with one or two starters missing in defence or midfield, and probably up front, but we would likely be up a creek without Pickford. Still, I agree with the comment that we have a much more balanced squad at this point. Plus, we've moved out past prima donnas and most of those who are overpaid. Thelwell deserves credit for a job well done and for setting the right expectations.

  6. 17 hours ago, Palfy said:

     

    Are you feeling left out? 🤔 I can add you in the commentary if you wish!

    "Palfy's predictions may not have reached the heights of success in recent games but could possibly warrant the 'Highly Commended' commiseratory designation. His strength this season is consistency: bang average for the month, bang average for the season, and bang average per prediction."

     

  7. 21 hours ago, Haiku said:

    I think bringing him back would be the best piece of business the club can do for a number of reasons:

    1. He wants to come back, and his affection for the club is evident.
    2. He's not that valuable for Tottenham, and they would be willing to replace him. I believe they would accept an offer worth £40-50m, so we can actually make a small profit.
    3. There's almost no risk involved. We know exactly what we are getting.
    4. He improves us right off the bat.
    5. Hard working player, the type Dyche appreciates.
    6. It's a love story. Commercially, his return will generate a big chunk of the transfer fee paid.
    7. He loves the club, and he is worth more to us than anyone else. We need more players like him.

    It would never happen unless an exchange: Branthwaite for Richarlison and Pedro Porro, for example. The fact is, though, that we invested in our forward line by bringing in Beto, Chermiti, and others. Would you swap DC-L for Richarlison, for example?

×
×
  • Create New...