markjazzbassist Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 In my opinion American sports are in the middle of being destroyed by video replay. Football and basketball being the biggest. Massive delays to the game, stopping the play, calls still called wrong, etc. also because of replay now penalties and fouls are up in numbers which causes more replays for those penalties or fouls. It’s ciclical. at this moment I am happy soccer does not have video replay. I think allowing some error and just living with it is better than the stop/start and delay of games and momentum replay causes. Not to mention, they might not even get it right (Italian league already had many issues this year). what is your opinion on replay/VAR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubecula Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 As long as it does not disrupt play I don't really care about it to be honest Mark. However the moment it does impact in a detrimental way I will be against it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 I’d like it only when a “challenge flag” is laid down by the manager or captain, and there’s only 3 for the game per team. Win the challenge, keep your flag. Lose the challenge, lose the flag. That way, if there’s repeated challenges won, it shows the officials need to improve, if not there’s only 6 replays to watch. Oh, and all replays should have a 30s cap, at which point whomever is adjudicating has to make a decision either way or challenge fails because it’s not clear cut. StevO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markjazzbassist Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Matt said: I’d like it only when a “challenge flag” is laid down by the manager or captain, and there’s only 3 for the game per team. Win the challenge, keep your flag. Lose the challenge, lose the flag. That way, if there’s repeated challenges won, it shows the officials need to improve, if not there’s only 6 replays to watch. Oh, and all replays should have a 30s cap, at which point whomever is adjudicating has to make a decision either way or challenge fails because it’s not clear cut. Good ideas matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 8 hours ago, rubecula said: As long as it does not disrupt play I don't really care about it to be honest Mark. However the moment it does impact in a detrimental way I will be against it. I agree and I'm also not sure how it will work because some decisions are really debatable. Look at our pen against Liverpool, some think it was, some think it wasn't. Same with the Niasse "dive". The sports in which VAR is currently used have a lot more clear cut than it would be in football. rubecula 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markjazzbassist Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 12 minutes ago, Bailey said: I agree and I'm also not sure how it will work because some decisions are really debatable. Look at our pen against Liverpool, some think it was, some think it wasn't. Same with the Niasse "dive". The sports in which VAR is currently used have a lot more clear cut than it would be in football. Good point. That’s why I’m against it. Because if it’s going to be stopping the match and it’s not clear cut (like basketball) then why even have it? I think they can have the goal replay tech like hockey where every goal is reviewed (there’s little to no stoppage 95%) of the time. They verify it wasn’t a hand ball in or offside or whatever while the players head back to face off. Very quick. It’s only done by people in the booth and it only gets stopped/mentioned by refs if it’s not a goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 20 minutes ago, Bailey said: I agree and I'm also not sure how it will work because some decisions are really debatable. Look at our pen against Liverpool, some think it was, some think it wasn't. Same with the Niasse "dive". I think in debatable/borderline situations such as that we could follow cricket and go with "umpire's (ref's) call" so the original decision stands. Has to be a 100% rock solid case for it to be overturned (eg Ashley Young sent off and a pen awarded yesterday). Bailey, markjazzbassist and pete0 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markjazzbassist Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, MikeO said: I think in debatable/borderline situations such as that we could follow cricket and go with "umpire's (ref's) call" so the original decision stands. I like that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, MikeO said: I think in debatable/borderline situations such as that we could follow cricket and go with "umpire's (ref's) call" so the original decision stands. Has to be a 100% rock solid case for it to be overturned (eg Ashley Young sent off and a pen awarded yesterday). Agreed. What's the next order of business 😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 5 minutes ago, Bailey said: What's the next order of business World peace? We could always sort that over a few beers or a glass of Cava. Bailey and markjazzbassist 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c1982 Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 This how VAR should be done with a mic’ed up ref... StevO, Matt, pete0 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 9 minutes ago, c1982 said: This how VAR should be done with a mic’ed up ref... Can we have him for every game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 32 minutes ago, c1982 said: This how VAR should be done with a mic’ed up ref... Completely agree. Its nice to hear a referee with such common sense as well! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted March 19, 2019 Report Share Posted March 19, 2019 Refreshing to see an none arrogant one. Compare him to the likes of ours https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/everton/12128081/Evertons-Phil-Jagielka-brands-referee-Martin-Atkinson-arrogant-over-controversial-Manchester-City-goal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 2 hours ago, c1982 said: This how VAR should be done with a mic’ed up ref... By ‘leaving for the Championship’ does that mean he’s come over here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete0 Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: By ‘leaving for the Championship’ does that mean he’s come over here? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/who-is-referee-jarred-gillett-2457744.amp Will be the league below but potentially the Prem as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted March 20, 2019 Report Share Posted March 20, 2019 The sooner we take the rugby approach, the better. Btay 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted June 24, 2019 Report Share Posted June 24, 2019 VAR was supposed to be introduced to look back at obvious errors by the reffing team. Now they are looking at everything and it’s stupid. Chalking goals off for somebody’s finger being offside is a joke. Just rectify the glaring errors and leave the rest alone!!!! Matt and MikeO 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted June 24, 2019 Report Share Posted June 24, 2019 45 minutes ago, Finn balor said: VAR was supposed to be introduced to look back at obvious errors by the reffing team. Now they are looking at everything and it’s stupid. Chalking goals off for somebody’s finger being offside is a joke. Just rectify the glaring errors and leave the rest alone!!!! Amen to that, couldn't agree more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palfy Posted June 24, 2019 Report Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Finn balor said: VAR was supposed to be introduced to look back at obvious errors by the reffing team. Now they are looking at everything and it’s stupid. Chalking goals off for somebody’s finger being offside is a joke. Just rectify the glaring errors and leave the rest alone!!!! Get rid of it completely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted June 25, 2019 Report Share Posted June 25, 2019 I never wanted it but can tolerate it if it’s a bad error or there is a lot of controversy behind it but I don’t where it’s going to end. Strikers will just fall over if there shirt is pulled in the box every time and want a penalty and by the letter of the law they should get them. Players and fans aren’t going to want to celebrate a goal anymore cos they know it’ll be reviewed and you lose the feeling of what the game is about. I think it’s going to go tits up next season big time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haiku Posted June 25, 2019 Report Share Posted June 25, 2019 I think it would be wise if VAR is used at certain number of times during the game, only upon appeal from one of the managers. For example 2 calls for each team and no more. Matt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted June 25, 2019 Report Share Posted June 25, 2019 That’s an idea or it just needs more robust officiating or the people at the cameras just say no it was marginal so we will go with the officials. If it’s glaring, ie dive or miles off than they should be looked at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 It’s going to get on my tits this season. Even the shites game last night they were checking every goal to see if it was “legal”. It’s supposed to sort out “clear” errors not going through goals step by step. Is going to ruin the game markjazzbassist 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 Already started. Third goal for city cancelled off. Load of wank Zoo 2.0 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 36 minutes ago, Finn balor said: Already started. Third goal for city cancelled off. Load of wank Doesn't seem to have dampened their spirits mind... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn balor Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 I know but it’s just shit. It’s getting used for all the wrong reasons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 It'll take time to adapt it to reality. Hopefully the powers that be will quickly learn that it should only be reviewed on call from a manager, and that they've only got a number of calls, losing 1 each time their call is wrong. It's so fucking simple.. Sibdane 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibdane Posted August 10, 2019 Report Share Posted August 10, 2019 2 hours ago, Matt said: It'll take time to adapt it to reality. Hopefully the powers that be will quickly learn that it should only be reviewed on call from a manager, and that they've only got a number of calls, losing 1 each time their call is wrong. It's so fucking simple.. Similar to challenge rules in the NFL. I like being able to limit the coach for a little bit. Matt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btay Posted August 13, 2019 Report Share Posted August 13, 2019 On 10/08/2019 at 23:30, Matt said: It'll take time to adapt it to reality. Hopefully the powers that be will quickly learn that it should only be reviewed on call from a manager, and that they've only got a number of calls, losing 1 each time their call is wrong. It's so fucking simple.. Manager or on field captain. Similar to cricket Matt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.