KillaGTiR Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 http://www.evertonfc.com/news/index.php?page_id=9191 now now people what do ya think of thaT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Nice one Suprised to see Man city there. Imagine if they where to do well on the pitch See noocastle up there, but think there on the slide as far as finances are concerned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 In a word rooney We wont be there next season thats for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Newcastle have a massive following - and a much bigger stadium capacity than us. And that is the biggest revenue earner. Don't really know how Spurs are so high as I wouldn't say White Hart Lane is that big. And the last couple of seasons they have not been on TV much more than the norm, won decent prize money or stepped foot in Europe. Answers on a post card as to why Spurs revenue is so high? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Newcastle have a massive following - and a much bigger stadium capacity than us. And that is the biggest revenue earner. Don't really know how Spurs are so high as I wouldn't say White Hart Lane is that big. And the last couple of seasons they have not been on TV much more than the norm, won decent prize money or stepped foot in Europe. Answers on a post card as to why Spurs revenue is so high? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Owners with ambition and money?? Just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_webby Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 yep 30 odd mil from rooney sale takes us to about 30 mil which would sound about right with champ league run even though not very far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Thought it wouldnt be long before all the doom and gloomers put a negative spin on things Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Thought it wouldnt be long before all the doom and gloomers put a negative spin on things <{POST_SNAPBACK}> not spin..just stateing the obvious Given the fact we had no money to bring anyone in in the transfer window,. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 One thing to say - Better to be in the top 20 - However, it was done, than not being in it. So in no way can being the top 20 be a negative thinking. Selling Rooney - whatever, we've seen all that money given to Moyes last January and the summer with it ALL gone on rebuilding of the squad. Beattie Davies Neville VDM Valente Arteta Ruddy Ferrari Kroldroup (although we have lost a few quid on him, but most of that money is back in the bank) All we had before was Rooney and a load of ordinary players in the main and a bag of beans for bringing in new player. Squad is now stronger than it has been since the good old days of the mid eighties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 One thing to say - Better to be in the top 20 - However, it was done, than not being in it. So in no way can being the top 20 be a negative thinking. Selling Rooney - whatever, we've seen all that money given to Moyes last January and the summer with it ALL gone on rebuilding of the squad. Beattie Davies Neville VDM Valente Arteta Ruddy Ferrari Kroldroup (although we have lost a few quid on him, but most of that money is back in the bank) All we had before was Rooney and a load of ordinary players in the main and a bag of beans for bringing in new player. Squad is now stronger than it has been since the good old days of the mid eighties. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well the last part of the sentece is open for debate..but i'm tired and cant be arsed tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Looking again at the list its utter bollocks..i mean come man city there about £60 mill in debt FFS.. And we all know whos the richest club in the world are and thats chelsea Sure they lose money hand over fist but they buy the best and win the rest so its all a bit pointless tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Agree, the term 'TOP 20 RICH LIST' is more than a bit misleading. But is nice to know we made a few quid over a snapshot 12 month period rather than losing a few quid for a change. So has to be a positive in that respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluenose Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 And we all know whos the richest club in the world are and thats chelsea <{POST_SNAPBACK}> wrong chelski aint rich abramovich is rich if he walks chelsea will have to sell there best players they will go in to administration and will also go down. chelsea have to rely on abramovich;s millions to keep em up. and the 146million loss proves that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frecklyt Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 its nothin 2 do with the rooney sale on the bbc website it says the total doesnt include transfers in and out which explains why chelsea are so high. so wer that rich without rooney sumhow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jin Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 It's a chart that shows revenue and not actual money on the bank - So for that time period we earned £60 Million Which should mean that it has wiped out most of our debt if not all I was surprised when I did see it because even though we qualified for The CL and then the UEFA Cup we were out before we reached the proper rounds which is where all the money is It is a step in the right direction though Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hiya Jin, where you been hiding yourself. ????? Or is that BEFORE we pay any outstanding Debts, if thats the case we are still skint. ITS A CASE OF "IN ONE HAND AND OUT THE OTHER". Licker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randomness Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 maybe its cause dunc on pay as you play rather than £35G a week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 maybe its cause dunc on pay as you play rather than £35G a week <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He'd end up owing us money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFC fan in oz Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 Maybe because of our relations with Asia we've made alot of money from that and the same could be said of both Spurs and Man City who have two asian players playing in their squads. Not sure if it's right but could be as i'm sure once you've broken into the market over there you can make a big profit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Reg Reagan Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 its good to see that we are doing better than RS and the arses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trigger Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 £60M figure is Revenue for financial Year September 2004 to Septmeber 2005. Revenue = The total amount of money that was incomming to Everton during the 12 month period where Everton delivered the "item" that had been paid to Everton for. So in the case of the Rooney Money, the £60M figure should only include the second £10M of the installments of the £20M that Man Utd agreed to pay + any additional money linked to appearances etc. We'll be doing well to achieve this again for 2005/2006, but we should be around £50M+. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 So in the case of the Rooney Money, the £60M figure should only include the second £10M of the installments of the £20M that Man Utd agreed to pay + any additional money linked to appearances etc. The add ons where if manure won anything, and they've won feck all But, I shouldn't laugh as we haven't either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowlo-efc Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 not spin..just stateing the obvious Given the fact we had no money to bring anyone in in the transfer window,. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> JUST FOR INFO.. the Deloitte rankings does not take into account revenue from player purchases Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rowlo-efc Posted February 17, 2006 Report Share Posted February 17, 2006 JUST FOR INFO.. the Deloitte rankings does not take into account revenue from player purchases <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Before you lot reply - it cant take player trading into account due to the terms and conditions that are imposed i.e. buy now pay later. Our revenue was calculated (if you remember back to the AGM in October) without player trading. Therefore the Rooney money has had little, if any bearing on the revenue taken by the club. We had £12 from TV rights this year another £12 from finishing 4th plues extra sponsorship (£2m a year from Chang etc.) Plus merchandise and ticket sales and increased season ticket sales. - Normally - without the TV money and finishing 4th we manage to generate a revenue of around £40m (£44m 2003/2004) so with our prise money and tv we have increased our worth and entered the deloitte. there is no way that the rooney money (or any other transfer money) can be included in our £60m revenue figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
java2001e Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 whichever way you look at it we are rated the 9th richest club in the uk. that can't be too bad. the downside is that even rich clubs can still feel the pinch. arsenal sold viera, in part, because they didnt think they would get such a good price at a later date. huge transfer fees, agents fees, and player salaries are putting football out of business. and its a bill that the fans are always expected to foot. its reached a point where attendances will soon colllapse and so will a lottal clubs. that will be a very bad day for soccer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 Truth is,as Java has pointed out there is a colapse coming towards football,slowly granted but its on its way. Then we will see who the true fans are. The PL puppets who grabbed onto footballs shirttails in the 90s or the working man,who where priced out of grounds by the greed of football Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 Before you lot reply - it cant take player trading into account due to the terms and conditions that are imposed i.e. buy now pay later. Our revenue was calculated (if you remember back to the AGM in October) without player trading. Therefore the Rooney money has had little, if any bearing on the revenue taken by the club. We had £12 from TV rights this year another £12 from finishing 4th plues extra sponsorship (£2m a year from Chang etc.) Plus merchandise and ticket sales and increased season ticket sales. - Normally - without the TV money and finishing 4th we manage to generate a revenue of around £40m (£44m 2003/2004) so with our prise money and tv we have increased our worth and entered the deloitte. there is no way that the rooney money (or any other transfer money) can be included in our £60m revenue figure. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks for clarifying things, Rowlo. Becasue what you say makes a huge difference in the way this 'rich list' is viewed. Still makes you wonder how Man City and Man City come so high in it. And I reiterate what I say being in it has to be better than being outside it and it is fact that the club IS progressing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 RuffRob said............"Still makes you wonder how Man City and Man City come so high in it." ........... Two Man City's in the league. ................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 We had £12 from TV rights this yearanother £12 from finishing 4th <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ...I know we are unfairly treated in comparison to some clubs by the FA but twenty-four quid's a bit bloody mean!! . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fozzie22 Posted February 20, 2006 Report Share Posted February 20, 2006 ...I know we are unfairly treated in comparison to some clubs by the FA but twenty-four quid's a bit bloody mean!! . <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.