Jump to content

Carrager In Midfield


Recommended Posts

im now seriously doubting svens judgement here.

 

he said he will pick what he thinks is the strongest team he can field but he puts carrager in the holding midfield role.

 

he has picked 9 midfielders and one of them (carrick) is the best holding midfielder in the country and yet he picls a centre back in the holding midfield role and claims its the best team he can field.

 

 

FFS id rather have owen hargreaves there coz carrager is a centre back and a centreback only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a piss poor performance, can the swedish prick not see that owen upfront on his fucking own doesnt work coz he cant hold the ball up and has a shit first touch? It should have been 442, i have no idea wtf Sven is doing, but if we win the world cup with that prick in charge ill pay him his £5million myself :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lampard was hardly in the game tonight, that f##kin diamond plan doesnt work.

 

Why do we need a holding midfielder, ? if we play 4-4-2 its as good a midfield as you can get.

Beckham and Cole out wide, Lampard and Gerrard will always be on the edge of the Box for the loose ball coming out.

 

All it does when you play around with that system is weaken the attack, it just puts an extra man in a defensive mode.

 

If we play the english way them fookin foreigners shit themselves, but we try and change our system to the way they play, and it doesnt work.

 

They are born and bred ENGLISH players, for fook sake play the ENGLISH WAY.

 

PS.............How the fook does that Hargreaves get into the England team, he's shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thought carra played well there tbh, cole was on fire, lampard wasn't his usual self, gerrard in his position worked but not to a gr8 extent, hungarys goal was amazing tho, hargreaves backed away from blocking the shot, could have easily avoided that goal if he would have put in a tackle, wud rather see carrick play in that holding midfeild role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im now seriously doubting svens judgement here.

 

he said he will pick what he thinks is the strongest team he can field but he puts carrager in the holding midfield role.

 

he has picked 9 midfielders and one of them (carrick) is the best holding midfielder in the country and yet he picls a centre back in the holding midfield role and claims its the best team he can field.

FFS id rather have owen hargreaves there coz carrager is a centre back and a centreback only

 

Carrick's not even a defensive midfielder, mate. He's a central midfielder capable of doing a good, no, an excellent job in a 442. But in a 451, a DM needs to know how to tackle. Carricks a poor tackler. A DM in a 451 needs to sit in front of the defense for 90 minutes, break up attacks and do nothing else. Carrick likes to roam a lot, not very obedient.

 

King would have been perfect as a defensive midfielder (too bad he's injured), he is the best tackler in England on par with Carragher and Terry. So its no surprise that Carrick never got played. if he is to be play, then that would be in a 442 in CM where the defensive responsibilities iare minimum.

 

And Carra was pretty decent in yesterday's game.

 

Owen in a one up top system is not going to work, he looked average yesterday, and Walcott looked a tad overawed. I tell you with no bias, Crouch looked class yesterday, caused the defence a lot of problems and he IS going to have an excellent world cup if he gets the starts. He's been good for England ever since you guys played the Argies and still doesnt get the credit he deserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lampard was hardly in the game tonight, that f##kin diamond plan doesnt work.

 

Why do we need a holding midfielder, ? if we play 4-4-2  its as good a midfield as you can get.

Beckham and Cole out wide, Lampard and Gerrard will always be on the edge of the Box for the loose ball coming out.

 

All it does when you play around with that system is weaken the  attack, it just puts an extra man in a defensive mode.

 

If we play the english way them fookin foreigners shit themselves, but we try and change our system to the way they play, and it doesnt work.

 

They are born and bred ENGLISH players, for fook sake play the ENGLISH WAY.

 

Probably because if Gerrard and Lampard play together, it doesnt work? When both of them are played in a 442, it is usually Gerrard who gets the defensive role where he isnt at his best.

 

If another player if added in midfield, then in allows both Gerrard and Lampard to go forward whenever they wish, which does add to the attacking prowess. So, playing another striker doesnt add much to the attack because then, the central midfielders cant go forward whenever the oppurtunity arises.

 

Beckham---Gerrard----Lampard---Cole

---Owen------------------Crouch

 

might work against the weaker teams, but a Brazil, A Czech Republic, An Argentina, A sweden or any other team with good attacking midfielders will use the space in midfield and carve England open.

 

IMO, for once Sven's right in using the formation he is currently using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carrick's not even a defensive midfielder, mate. He's a central midfielder capable of doing a good, no, an excellent job in a 442. But in a 451, a DM needs to know how to tackle. Carricks a poor tackler. A DM in a 451 needs to sit in front of the defense for 90 minutes, break up attacks and do nothing else. Carrick likes to roam a lot, not very obedient.

 

King would have been perfect as a defensive midfielder (too bad he's injured), he is the best tackler in England on par with Carragher and Terry. So its no surprise that Carrick never got played. if he is to be play, then that would be in a 442 in CM where the defensive responsibilities iare minimum.

 

And Carra was pretty decent in yesterday's game.

 

Owen in a one up top system is not going to work, he looked average yesterday, and Walcott looked a tad overawed. I tell you with no bias, Crouch looked class yesterday, caused the defence a lot of problems and he IS going to have an excellent world cup if he gets the starts. He's been good for England ever since you guys played the Argies and still doesnt get the credit he deserves.

 

A Ha HA HA HA HA AHA AHAH HA HA AHAAHAH HAH HAHA HAHAH HHAHAH HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAH HAHHAH HAH HAH HAH HH HAHHHAHHAHHHAHHAHH H HAHHH

 

HA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

credit wheres it due, crouch played v well when he came on last night. his touch was excellent and the goal was a peach. i think he played his way more in svens plans and will be more accepted by the fans after that performance. i still dont rate him but if he keeps that up i will have been wrong along with 90% of the country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carrick's not even a defensive midfielder, mate. He's a central midfielder capable of doing a good, no, an excellent job in a 442. But in a 451, a DM needs to know how to tackle. Carricks a poor tackler. A DM in a 451 needs to sit in front of the defense for 90 minutes, break up attacks and do nothing else. Carrick likes to roam a lot, not very obedient.

 

King would have been perfect as a defensive midfielder (too bad he's injured), he is the best tackler in England on par with Carragher and Terry. So its no surprise that Carrick never got played. if he is to be play, then that would be in a 442 in CM where the defensive responsibilities iare minimum.

 

And Carra was pretty decent in yesterday's game.

 

Owen in a one up top system is not going to work, he looked average yesterday, and Walcott looked a tad overawed. I tell you with no bias, Crouch looked class yesterday, caused the defence a lot of problems and he IS going to have an excellent world cup if he gets the starts. He's been good for England ever since you guys played the Argies and still doesnt get the credit he deserves.

 

Wher are you from then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a joke, if Phil Neville was still playin 4 man utd then he would be the first choice defensive midfielder. But considerin he plays for a so called shit club he doesnt play. Thank christ tht swedish knob is leaving. Oh and playin OWEN HARGREVES ahead of him is also takin the piss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...