StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 when did anyone take Reg seriously? i love you Reg, you make me giggle! oh look, Xavier had critisism for some of the England team, oh look again, not Crouch! i thought he was starting to look like a better player, but how many chances does he need to score a goal? he isnt showing the "great feet" we were told about when he didnt score for 20 games, and if i have to comment on his heading again im gunna murder my neighbours cat! i'm 6"2, i cant head a ball for sh1te, but if Beckham was crossing like he does and i had a 7inch advantage over my marker id have a few more goals to my name! one final word for the England situation.........451 (i know its not a word) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 451 with England doesnt work, well not with Crouch upfront on his own anyway, that was shown in one of th friendlies (i cant remember who it was against) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 (edited) with Crouch no, but with Rooney? why not? if we play with the Chelsea formation it would bring the best out of Cole and Lampard, plus Gerrard will also be free to attack. ---------------Hargreeves------------- Beckham--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole -----------------Rooney--------------- or --------------Beckham-------------- Lennon--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole ---------------Rooney--------------- or Beckham--Gerrard--Lampard Lennon------Rooney------Cole i see no reason why Rooney couldnt play the lone striker we would forget the long ball we would have more freedom for gerrard and lampard i really think this is the best option for England at the moment Edited June 21, 2006 by StevO_BluE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I suppose so mate, its about the only option we have. But no doubt Svender will play Crouch either with Rooney or on his own Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 can we get Hargreeves to play against Crouch in training so he can take some frustration out on his shins? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I have actually been hoping for Crouch to break his leg Do you think its possible Svender might choose to play Rooney in midfield? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 with Crouch no, but with Rooney? why not?if we play with the Chelsea formation it would bring the best out of Cole and Lampard, plus Gerrard will also be free to attack. ---------------Hargreeves------------- Beckham--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole -----------------Rooney--------------- or --------------Beckham-------------- Lennon--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole ---------------Rooney--------------- or Beckham--Gerrard--Lampard Lennon------Rooney------Cole i see no reason why Rooney couldnt play the lone striker we would forget the long ball we would have more freedom for gerrard and lampard i really think this is the best option for England at the moment 31959[/snapback] i like that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I have actually been hoping for Crouch to break his leg Do you think its possible Svender might choose to play Rooney in midfield? 31976[/snapback] i didnt mean that formation to be with Rooney in midfield, i meant it as 451 when defending, but when attacking it quickly becomes 433. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 Rooney wont play in midfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 i didnt mean that formation to be with Rooney in midfield, i meant it as 451 when defending, but when attacking it quickly becomes 433. 31988[/snapback] No i didnt mean it like that in relation to your formation, i was just acting generally do you think Svender would play Rooney in midfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 no way and if he does i will be fookin mad, we need a quality striker and at the moment rooney is the only 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 im with Adam, Rooney is our only option i believe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 I wasnt saying i think Rooney should play in midfield, i was just wondering if Svender would ever put him there, it wouldnt surprise me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 i know what you mean now mate, respect has been restored Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 i know what you mean now mate, respect has been restored 32021[/snapback] Good, i knew you were starting to think i was a bit crazy or Svender's brother with my crazxy tactics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 (edited) If push comes to shove and he goes 4-5-1, Stevo's line-up has to be the one. --------------Beckham-------------- Lennon--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole ---------------Rooney--------------- Edited June 22, 2006 by toffeelicker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 VOTE StevO FOR ENGLAND MANAGER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 VOTE StevO FOR ENGLAND MANAGER 32157[/snapback] I put my name on that petition We will get better, my logic for that statement is simple, because we have to. ATB Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldfishMemory Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 (edited) If push comes to shove and he goes 4-5-1, Stevo's line-up has to be the one. --------------Beckham-------------- Lennon--Gerrard--Lampard--Cole ---------------Rooney--------------- 32061[/snapback] You cant play Beckham, Gerrard & Lampard in the centre of mid with 2 attacking wide men there would be fookin holes everywhere. My 5 man midfield England team --------------Robinson-------------- Cara------Rio------Terry------Cole --------------Hargreves------------- Lennon-------Lampard--------Cole ---------------Gerrard-------------- ---------------Rooney--------------- Ideally if we can get Neville fit then i'd play --------------Robinson-------------- Neville----Cara-----Terry-----Cole --------------Ferdinand------------- Lennon-------Lampard--------Cole ---------------Gerrard-------------- ---------------Rooney--------------- Votes for the fish to be in charge????? Edit: Ta Adam Edited June 22, 2006 by GoldfishMemory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 Goldfish how can we have Rio in the back 4 and have Ferdy at the back of the diamond? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ola Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 Goldfish how can we have Rio in the back 4 and have Ferdy at the back of the diamond? 32184[/snapback] new tactics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 with mine Beckham is the player falling back, not necessarily doing all the tackling, but to make room for the others to play more freely, and we can still utilise his great range of passing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 Exactly................Hargreaves wouldnt get into Evertons team never mind Englands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny the Blue Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 Use Carrick, he can provide amazin passes for Lamps and Gerrard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldfishMemory Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 (edited) We need a tackler and Hargreves does that even if his final ball is sh1t, cant play Becham there cos he shits out of challenges anyone remember the lead up to brazil's goal when Beckham sh1t out the challenge? This word filter is crap, it changes sh1t to poo but lets you write shits!! Edited June 23, 2006 by GoldfishMemory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 ""Use Carrick, he can provide amazin passes for Lamps and Gerrard."" ............................. If he never used Carrick in the Group games, i cant see him using him in the Knockout stages..........untried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 You cant play Beckham, Gerrard & Lampard in the centre of mid with 2 attacking wide men there would be fookin holes everywhere. My 5 man midfield England team --------------Robinson-------------- Cara------Rio------Terry------Cole --------------Hargreves------------- Lennon-------Lampard--------Cole ---------------Gerrard-------------- ---------------Rooney--------------- Ideally if we can get Neville fit then i'd play --------------Robinson-------------- Neville----Cara-----Terry-----Cole --------------Ferdinand------------- Lennon-------Lampard--------Cole ---------------Gerrard-------------- ---------------Rooney--------------- Votes for the fish to be in charge????? Edit: Ta Adam 32178[/snapback] Like it but i doubt Beckham wil be dropped Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 i doubt Beckham would be dropped too, but why would anyone want to drop him at the moment? we dont have many players doing a good job, but Beckham is most deffinately one of our best players of the world cup so far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adams Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Agree and most of the goals have been from him so defently dnt drop Becks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 but the way i see playing him in the holding role is; hes out of position there as would be gerrard and lampard. so it wont make us any weaker defensively, but to have the other two more forward really strentghens our attack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.