Jump to content
IGNORED

Orel Mangala


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, dunlopp9987 said:

Is this signing meant to take up another midfield spot so that Garner can play RB? Because I don't see us getting a RB in before the end of the window

I don’t see the RB position being as big a problem as the LB position should Mykolenko become injured, we have 2 decent options at RB in Coleman and Patterson with 2 who could play there if need be in Young and Garner. 
But on the left we only have Mykolenko and a poor young as a backup, imo the LB position is in a far more perilous position than the RB position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dunlopp9987 said:

Is this signing meant to take up another midfield spot so that Garner can play RB? Because I don't see us getting a RB in before the end of the window

We’ve got loads of right backs, we don’t need to get Garner in there. Maybe just get Patterson fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt said:

As a back up his injuries can be managed. He's a good player when fit. 

To back up you have to be fit and he struggles with that.

The bigger stumbling block is his massive wages, so fortunately I won't have to be worried about you being happy :lol:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Palfy said:

I don’t see the RB position being as big a problem as the LB position should Mykolenko become injured, we have 2 decent options at RB in Coleman and Patterson with 2 who could play there if need be in Young and Garner. 
But on the left we only have Mykolenko and a poor young as a backup, imo the LB position is in a far more perilous position than the RB position. 

“Should Mykolenko become injured” 

Rb is currently a downright disaster. We don’t have a single option suited to start there for a full campaign. If you like Patterson there then fine but Dyche has shown over and over that he doesn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matt Tiger said:

“Should Mykolenko become injured” 

Rb is currently a downright disaster. We don’t have a single option suited to start there for a full campaign. If you like Patterson there then fine but Dyche has shown over and over that he doesn’t. 

My point being we have 2-3 players in this squad who can fill in if Coleman and Patterson if they are both injured, in Garner, Young, and Holgate who have all played for us in that position, who do we have to fill in for Mykolenko if he becomes injured, so I wouldn’t be rushing out to buy a RB when we have no cover at LB. 
Dyche doesn’t know his arse from his elbow so I wouldn’t take much stock on his view of Patterson, if Patterson was his only option I’d be very happy all Patterson needs is a decent run in the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, badaids said:

But is he any good?

 

No idea to be honest but I do remember him scoring a cracker for Forest

Edit: if his highlights show anything, he might make a really good partnership with Timi. I can hope :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...