Mickey Dr

Video by MDMD99, that wouldnt be you would it MD. Have you put it on your own forum.

Who cares? It is on a Chelsea forum too. So what do you think of Neville's then and his after match comments?

On the match - we are getting swamped in midfield by a lot of mid table sides. We play 3 up front, and Malouda when in midfield often players like a winger. Both FBs push up, and so 4 or 5 players have to do all the work. When the 3 strikers are on form the oppo backs off and we can win 6-0. If they aren't - and they haven't been since mid September - we have been pretty easy to turn over.

19 senior pros (including 3 keepers) and some kids the manager is reluctant to play, it is going to be a long cold winter for us if we get more injuries or don't bring in 3 or 4 at January.

The recent managerial changes probably mean the board has finally realised what went wrong and hopefully is now more supportive of Ancelotti. That isn't what the papers write, but they get everything wrong.

the refs were honestly so biased today though. first not booking malouda for stamping on neville. then booking neville for drogba stopping to shove into him. terrible calls against coleman by the linesman throughout the second half. don't even get me started on the "penalty" incident. how can they say howard fouled anelka when anelka threw his arms out and mowed howard down?

Chelsea fan here - on the penalty decision given you are half right. Of course under the laws that wasn't a foul, and strictly it wasn't even obstruction (which is only an indirect free kick anyway). But under the interpretations week in week out, refs will always give that as a direct free kick foul / penalty. I think it is wrong - but they are consistent on that, and all strikers take advantage of it. (Then there was also the Coleman foul on Ashley Cole that was a clear penalty and Red card - but we don't get them given to us much - one in two is at least better than 0 out of 3 a week ago).

On Cahill/Cech - likely was an accident.

On the Neville incident - this is what he had to say:

Four minutes after being slapped, the Evertoncaptain was booked for aclumsy challenge onDidier Drogba. Neville said: 'It was myfirst tackle of the gameand after it I get struck in the face and I'm the one who ends up gettingbooked later on. I thinkit's the wrong decision. '

But hang on a bit - how does that fit with the video evidence? First, Neville clatters Malouda just a minute earlier, so his evidence doesn't sound very reliable. Then lets look. Can anyone see the stamp? Can anyone see the slap? And where was the slap - on Nevilles eyes/forehead which he clutches at first? or on his chin which he is rubbing after? And does anyone really think Neville comes out of it like a hero?

Watch the video before you comment please.