GoldfishMemory Posted March 20, 2007 Report Posted March 20, 2007 I know they move matches all the time due to cup commitments but does anyone else think this is just a blatant attempt by the league to make a big spectacle of things. I also dont know how add time etc works but I think a possible championship clincher between the top 2 teams would pull in premium rates & possibly massive pay per view cash or am I just being sceptical of the money men in out game??? http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/e...rem/6472715.stm Quote
aaron Posted March 20, 2007 Report Posted March 20, 2007 think you may have a point but you have to admit it is entertaining and would be great if the title decider goes down to the wire. Quote
Louis Posted March 20, 2007 Report Posted March 20, 2007 It's all about the benjamins baby. I would not be surprised to see all the football league games on PPV within the next ten years Quote
Bill Posted March 20, 2007 Report Posted March 20, 2007 TV rule the FA now, THEY TELL THEM WHAT GAMES THEY WANT TO COVER AN WHAT TIME TO KO. Thats why you get games on at 1 pm, another at 3 pm, and another at 5 pm, thats why they give the prem teams so much money. Quote
Rob W Posted March 22, 2007 Report Posted March 22, 2007 (edited) think they may have egg on their face cos if utd have won it by then there wont be much interest in it at all. at least in april they would defnitely have a chance of catching up. maybe thats why they put our last game against chelsea, thinking it would be a title decider and all! Edited March 22, 2007 by bluerob78 Quote
GoldfishMemory Posted March 22, 2007 Author Report Posted March 22, 2007 ^^^ Should the gap stay exactly the same as it is today it would be the title clinching game tho! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.