MikeO Posted November 19, 2007 Report Posted November 19, 2007 I know people will gamble on a lot of stuff, but this is pretty sick imo... >>>LINK<<< Don't know how long the Baiji has left but I'd fancy a little flutter on homo sapiens myself....might have a little problem picking up the winnings though . Quote
LexKing Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 I dont understand word extinck , but does it mean like that species will be gone forever? Quote
MikeO Posted November 23, 2007 Author Report Posted November 23, 2007 I dont understand word extinck , but does it mean like that species will be gone forever? Correct . Quote
TrueBlue Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 I don't get all this bloody animal saving tbh. Its part of life, thats evolution battle of the fittest and all that. Who cares if there won't be any panda's or tigers in 50 years time? Obviously theres the egcological problem in the fact that if Polar bears become extinct then the population of seals will grow which will have a big effect on other animals. But, it's all about the world changing, as we all know that our modern world (excluding what we did to it) was completely difference millions of years ago. The world changes and the animals on it learn to go wih the change or die out. It's like all this global warming nonsence...no in fact I won't go there as that'll be another can of worms opened. Just my opinion on the matter Quote
Calico Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 Animal extinction caused by human action is not a part of evolution. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.