Guest efctaxi Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 It struck me that if City were prepared to pay well over £100 million for Kaka , then what price would they have to stump up for Gerrard . If we had a choice of one or the other in our team , I'm fairly sure most of us would opt for Gerrard ( forget he's a red ) . Without him , Liverpool would be pretty lame , so if he's worth that much to Liverpool , how much is he worth to anybody else ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 The question I'd always ask is would he be the same player for any other team? He never performs for England the way he does for Liverpool, so loathe him or hate him you have to say that he really does seem to love his club with a passion....and raises his game (indeed carries the whole club on his back) when he has to. I don't think he could feel the same playing for City or anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 seems like jags really i mean he never shone like this for sheff united he wasn't bad but never THIS good but now he's at his boyhood club isn't he does that give him the extra boost? think it must do cos as you say gerrard never turns up for england so obviously doesn't care as much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 You do Jags a dishonour, he was voted best player for them for two seasons, and selected in the Championship team of the season by his fellow professionals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 i know he was but would you have thought about him in the england squad though? seems hes really stepped up his game since comin here i mean i knew of him but wouldn't of thought he'd be this good! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest efctaxi Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Typical . I ask a question about Gerrard , and a discussion about Jags ensues Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottish Red Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 Gerrard is worth no more than 30 million. Why? Because I think football should get back to the good old days gradually. I'm so happy that Kaka turned that contract down. Football is dying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 yeah it is a good thing i mean 100 million for one player far too much plus the wages what would other players want then? only these backed by people who use the club as a play thing would survive money wise then! and also id prefer talk about jags then gerrard but yeah id say 30 is about right by todays prices! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest efctaxi Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 Yes , Kaka turned the move down , but we are forgetting that he wasn't the first to be offered stupid money . Didn't Beckham sign a 5 year deal worth $250 million ? I think the price on Gerrards head would surpass anything the premiership has experienced so far for sure . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.