Jimmy the blue Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Just a quick attempt to test the water. Will Tim win his appeal, vote now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy the blue Posted September 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 A MOD has been asked to sort the vote box out, no yes box appeared, strange but true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiemaher85 Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 I thought you where just being ironic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Just a quick attempt to test the water. Will Tim win his appeal, vote now He wont win, FA arn't going to go against Riley of all people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Not a chance of him winning the appeal, the yes vote isn't needed anyway mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 A MOD has been asked to sort the vote box out, no yes box appeared, strange but true Done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 i voted yes on the grounds of it should, but i know as many of you do there isnt a cat in hells chance cahill will have it over turned. We are not one of the big4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaToffee Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 It'll get knocked down to one game - rememebr there is an exception to every rule, even the one about the FA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy the blue Posted September 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Because he acted like a prat after the tackle I think they'll do him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakeyblue Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 errrr are we manure, the arse ,chelski or the shite nope so no we wont win the appeal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted September 29, 2008 Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Because he acted like a prat after the tackle I think they'll do him Not admissable surely, like I said elsewhere, if he'd got two yellows then there'd be no argument but it was a straight red so Riley has to (if he wants to justify it) say he gave it for the tackle or for TC being a nasty ill-mannered Ozzie. Neither stand up as a red card offence, case dismissed . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy the blue Posted September 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2008 Not admissable surely, like I said elsewhere, if he'd got two yellows then there'd be no argument but it was a straight red so Riley has to (if he wants to justify it) say he gave it for the tackle or for TC being a nasty ill-mannered Ozzie. Neither stand up as a red card offence, case dismissed . Mike, what has admissibility got to do with it, its the FA and OMR after all is said and done..............they make the rules literally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryj Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 (edited) It could be a blessing in disguise! Hear me out..... So far the 4-5-1 hasn't worked and with Timmy out I could see us playing 4-4-2 with Saha in (who has looked impressive). Only a thought and I think the appeal will be a waste of time, knowing the FA they'll probually stick on an extra game ban for appealing. Never a red card challenge though! Edited September 30, 2008 by barryj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy the blue Posted September 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Surprise surprise surprise, the fucking FA have, as the majority suggested, thrown out the appeal, possibly on the grounds that his name wasn't terry and he didn't play for England.......................nothing surprises me any more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiemaher85 Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Not shocked at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie blue Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Just announced Cahill lost his appeal what a suprise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Cahill loses red card appeal Everton midfielder Tim Cahill has lost his appeal for wrongful dismissal over the red card he was shown in Saturday's 2-0 defeat by Liverpool. Cahill, 28, was sent off for a challenge on Reds midfielder Xabi Alonso after 80 minutes. The Australia international will immediately start a three-match ban. He is eligible for Thursday's Uefa Cup tie against Standard Liege but misses his side's games against Newcastle, Arsenal and Manchester United. After the game, Everton manager David Moyes said he did not think the tackle deserved a red card, and he thought referee Mike Riley may have increased the punishment as Cahill walked away from him when he blew the whistle. But that would have meant two yellow cards, not a straight red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everton_Worshiper Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Oh well lesson learned, don't walk away from the referee whilst he has his "respect" cap on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 (edited) Oh well lesson learned, don't walk away from the referee whilst he has his "respect" cap on. Cahill loses red card appealEverton midfielder Tim Cahill has lost his appeal for wrongful dismissal over the red card he was shown in Saturday's 2-0 defeat by Liverpool. Cahill, 28, was sent off for a challenge on Reds midfielder Xabi Alonso after 80 minutes. The Australia international will immediately start a three-match ban. He is eligible for Thursday's Uefa Cup tie against Standard Liege but misses his side's games against Newcastle, Arsenal and Manchester United. After the game, Everton manager David Moyes said he did not think the tackle deserved a red card, and he thought referee Mike Riley may have increased the punishment as Cahill walked away from him when he blew the whistle. But that would have meant two yellow cards, not a straight red. <_< Edited September 30, 2008 by dark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 The referee is actually supposed to go to the player anyway, not the other way round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randomness Posted September 30, 2008 Report Share Posted September 30, 2008 Fa are contradicting themselves with this. wish we were one of the sky4 we could get away with murder then. even change sports halfway through a game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.