Jump to content
IGNORED

West H, Tevez, Man U.


Recommended Posts

dont know if anybody has any thoughts about this cos it seems like nobody wants to make a decision.

 

We all knew it was a dodgy deal when it happened, players that where valued at more than £30 million coming to west Ham without them paying a penny. West ham then claimed that the third party interest was no longer applicable and continued to play him even tho no money had still not been exchanged for him.

Of course we all know that SHEFF utd, Backed up by Wigan, and Fulham caused a stink resulting in the Court case, and everybody thought it had been sorted.

 

But now the third party (kia jerraboachin) or whatever his name is, is taking West H to court to prove he still owns the player who he now wants to sell to Man utd, on the other hand the FA have said Man utd must deal with, and pay any fee to West ham.

 

We all know that West ham never payed a penny for him and he was only on loan, so how can they expect to pocket £30 million quid for him.

 

The FA have also come out and made a further statement saying West ham will not recieve any more punishment over the whole Tevez affair, and have asked FIFA to help sort it. But i ask you, How can they say that if the outcome as to who owns him has not yet been decided. ?? If the third party wins the case and is found to still be the owner, The FA have made a catastrophic mistake, and West Ham could be in Serious Trouble and in fear of Relegation.

 

MEANWHILE, West Ham have maintained a deadly silence ....... it gets Curiouser and Curiouser.

 

 

ANY LEGAL MINDS OUT THERE WHO CAN MAKE HEADS OR TAILS OUT OF IT. ??? or just give an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you've summed it up pretty nicely Bill, I was reading the thread on it a few days back and we all knew it was dodgy/would end in tears but the suspicion at the time was that Chelski/Abramovich/Russian mafia were behind it...>>>LINK<<<.

 

Fuck knows how, or even who, is going to clear it up now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What i cant understand is, if he is a West Ham player why isnt he back training with them, he seems to be swanning around the world unattached, and Kia J insists that he still owns the player, if this is so then west ham are in trouble because the 3rd party ownership was not disolved.

 

Its a strange one, which as usual the FA have washed their hands of.

 

Bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an odd one Bill, but there are now so many unscrupulous agents in this world that contracts have evolved to the extent that an individual can "own" a human being. There are moral issues as well as the humanistic side to the whole sorry affair.

 

When the deal went through, I think all TT'ers agreed at the time it was sus. Moyes needs to get get his arse over to L.A. and sign up the Beckham boys.

 

ATB

 

Mac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...