duncanmckenzieismagic

Refer you back to Spurs who actually do have the best stadium in the country and the added bonus of being London and it’s been a lot longer

I can’t believe you think it’s that easy to find a stadium sponsor especially as it’s not even built yet, just ask Spurs! So explain to me what happens if the appeals committee sides with Everton on the loan interest being permissible or that they can’t change the rules part way through the process and stadium build? If they are taken out of the equation then we are comfortably compliant in both reporting periods and so there is no case to answer and therefore we are not guilty. Or am I missing something? The two charges are intrinsically linked because they cover 75% of the same accounts/ reporting periods and it’s already been pointed out by top barristers that this goes against natural justice

If they are going to throw the game they should tell the fans before the tickets go on sale

Watching that game he was so frustrating. He was clearly the best player on the pitch but most of the game just passed him by There was a 20 minute period at the end of the first half where he was superb but there were also times when his decision making was so poor The penalty miss summed up his game really. It was a great run by him which drew the foul but then the pen was so poor. It looked like he was trying to place it in to the top corner, no pace on it at all, but ended up miles high and wide

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history? The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

@Palfy

I’ve heard it’s because he can get better dental veneers in Saudi Arabia

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/what-andre-gomes-finch-farm-28513617

Probably because he is on a free

Just hit hit high and wide

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/electricians-walk-bramley-moore-dock-28507110

Got 75 minutes in for the U21’s v Benfica tonight

Playing well tonight for the U21’s v Benfica but just horrendously missed a pen

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/sean-dyche-right-transfers-not-28504800 All The more reason that we should not have received any sporting sanction

I’m all for 777 throwing in a £350M bid for Godfrey to stave off FFP, they probably wouldn’t actually pay it anytime soon but at least we could cook the books!

https://tbrfootball.com/frank-lampard-admits-he-was-stunned-by-how-good-one-amazing-everton-player-was/ Is it universally accepted that he is a great captain these days or do some still think he is a shit captain?

I think they are the rules for the EFL so don’t necessarily apply to EPL

If we get a transfer ban I don’t see how we can let anyone go. As per the Echo article I posted earlier Dele, Gomes,Gueye,Young,Coleman,Lonergan,Harrison & Danjuma are all out of contract in the summer so we could potentially lose all of them We already have a wafer thin squad so if we start selling players we can’t replace then there would be a real danger that we couldn’t fulfil all of our fixtures if we got a couple of injuries

With a possible transfer ban incoming we can’t afford to lose anybody, especially with Danjuma & Harrison only on loan and several players out of contract in the summer

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/everton-could-face-new-ffp-28493554

I think for everybody’s sanity we need to pause this thread until after the appeal. Clearly mitigation is not in Palfys vocabulary so no matter how many people try to explain why we have a case he isn’t going to accept it Lets just hope Palfy doesn’t get appointed to the panel for the appeal hearing or we are all fucked !