jcrawfor Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 (edited) City have put in a request to the Premier League to allow an "emergency" keeper loan as Given has been ruled out for the remainder. My link Too bad for them they've loaned out their #2 and their #3 is out injured. Would seem they should just use their #4...but I don't reckon the Sheik would be terribly happy about that. Edited April 26, 2010 by bluenoseyankee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 i feel sorry for the lad who finally has his chance to prove his worth, only for his club to go and find a replacement! be a little pissed off if it was me to be honest.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcrawfor Posted April 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 Yeah it's rubbish on City's part, but then who was I to expect anything else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 i feel sorry for the lad who finally has his chance to prove his worth, only for his club to go and find a replacement! be a little pissed off if it was me to be honest.... A bit like Turner and Ruddy when Moyes brings in Wessels, Nash and other 3rd rate keepers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraccerC Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 i cant believe we've paid a penny to/for nash...it's incredible when having, clearly a better keeper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/8644269.stm green light! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/apr/26/joe-hart-manchester-city-birmingham apparently want to bring Hart back from Brum. I didnt think this was allowed, am i wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 i'm pretty sure they can't there has to be a recall clause in the contract unless there is a special clause for such circumstances Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcrawfor Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 They've brought in Fulop for the remainder. Here's hoping he's worse than the one they've already got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 And apparently they're pissed off that they were blocked i their attempts to recall Hart. Already think they're above the rules <_<. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Brum were hoping to sign him on a permanent in the summer, that looks like the kiss of death for that deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.