Louis Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 That's the view of some people mentioned in here: http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_brit...icle2472083.ece Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 I didn't know Bush had a $1bn abstinence campaign and I didn't know the average age to loose your virginity is 16. Seems a bit young for an average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluenose Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 the abstinance campaign is a waste of time. if people want to have sex before they are married or even before age of consent. let em. and anyway im a virgin. i aint ashamed about it. neither do i think its cool whether you are or not. im just waiting for the right time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 (edited) alex i respect you for that, you say it without a care if you are one or not, you have my respect. who cares if you have or havent. im not one but i wouldnt be assed if i was tbh. Edited April 22, 2007 by Everton Lad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 The 1st time is usually shite anyway Alex, I admire and respect you for your stand. ATB Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 (edited) $1bn wont stop people from having sex lmao i no people that were 13 or 14 lol i aint saying that is kool (but it is life that is the way teenagers are these days) in america it 18 the age of consent in this country there are mothers of 2 or 3 by that age lol Edited April 22, 2007 by Foxon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluenose Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 yeh mainly coz our government give em free council houses and child benefits. we should do what the dutch do and send em home to thier parents. give em sod all and less 14 year olds will have children Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny the Blue Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 For what its worth you've got my stamp of aproval of the day Alex!! What you did there was darn right brave and I applaud you :thumbsup_anim: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 yeh mainly coz our government give em free council houses and child benefits. we should do what the dutch do and send em home to thier parents. give em sod all and less 14 year olds will have children but if we let millions of children go hungary and homeless i think the country would be in a worst state. it aint the childs fault hu there parents are. there is no way of stopping teenagers have sex the more the goverment say dont do it the more they will coz they think there 'ard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny the Blue Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 Second that. A big problem we've got today is the fact that its kids who are having kids. Its just a viceouse circle, one of my friends even said "Its alright if I get pregnant, council gives you a house and benifits, dont have to worry about anythin" Is it me or is that becoming the general attitude of today?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 general attitude of chavs mainly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluenose Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 not saying that the govt should/could stop teens having sex. but then again alot of 15/16 year olds deliberatly get pregnant as an easy way to get a house and money. (or at least in my area). if we put an age limits all benefits lets say over 18's. then less teens might be persuaded to keep thier legs closed as they wont get anything. just my view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Posted April 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 imo Alex.. should be 21.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 not saying that the govt should/could stop teens having sex. but then again alot of 15/16 year olds deliberatly get pregnant as an easy way to get a house and money. (or at least in my area). if we put an age limits all benefits lets say over 18's. then less teens might be persuaded to keep thier legs closed as they wont get anything. just my view. imo Alex.. should be 21.. Very valid points those Did you know the age of consent in spain is 12, but I dont think they have a good benefits system PS, I was 18 when I lost mine and it was worth the wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 Anyone who thinks that bringing up a baby in a council flat on benefits is an easy option is seriously deluded, it's tough enough at the best of times. But good on you Alex...if more had your attitude viz virginity there'd be hugely less pressure on people to lose it...deffo worth waiting for the right time, there's a world of difference between losing it to an old slapper behind the bike-sheds compared to someone you care about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 21 when I cracked my duck, I was so full at that time, but with a little self control I managed to aquitt myself very well. I think all the awl arses will agree with me here, the older you get, the better it gets. Especially when love is involved. ATB Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 i was 16 but i am still with her over 2 years now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 (edited) My personal option on the matter is people shouldn't have sex until they are financially and emotionally able to deal with the possible outcomes that can arise from it. Edited April 22, 2007 by Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 My personal option on the matter is people shouldn't have sex until they are financially and emotionally able to deal with the possible outcomes that can arise from it. if you wear a rubber hat then there is a 99.9% that the other will not get pregant so just wear 2 then there is a 198% that they wont so it is impossible lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 general attitude of chavs mainly. yup the only young mums round wigan are chavs lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 Is It Cool To Be A Virgin? Not when you are 40. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 good movie that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis Posted April 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 i was 16 but i am still with her over 2 years now Does your girlfriend know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 I have to admit I was a wee nipper when I lost mine. I don't think theres anything wrong with being a virgin though, I have respect for people who don't just throw it away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraccerC Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 if you wear a rubber hat then there is a 99.9% that the other will not get pregant so just wear 2 then there is a 198% that they wont so it is impossible lol unfortunately for your theory, maths doesn't work like that.... i hope it was a joke, hence the lol, bcause to get 198% is straight up retarded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 What we dont use the H&H sex method anymore? Hit then Hope. Thatd maybe explain all these paternity suits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 unfortunately for your theory, maths doesn't work like that.... i hope it was a joke, hence the lol, bcause to get 198% is straight up retarded yes it was a joke lol there is no such 198% lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 Does your girlfriend know? I hope so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 yes it was a joke lol there is no such 198% lol There is in football manager cliche speak (and anyway 99.9%+99.9% would equal 199.8%, not 198%....I knew that maths O level would come in useful one day ). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxon Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 There is in football manager cliche speak (and anyway 99.9%+99.9% would equal 199.8%, not 198%....I knew that maths O level would come in useful one day ). i did a rough estimate lol a very rough estimate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.