Jump to content

Elston Gunnn

Members
  • Posts

    2,605
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Elston Gunnn

  1. Disappointed.  Haven’t seen any evidence — none — that Maupay is effective on his own up front.  Doucouré rambles up and down the pitch, but has not much of a shot and gives the ball away, over-dribbling.  Much prefer Gray to McNeil, as we’re desperate for pace and some shots near the edge of the box.  Coady last match, 2d goal........

    So I can only hope to be ridiculously wrong, and stand ready to celebrate goals from Maupay, Doucouré, and McNeil, and the defensive performance of the year from Coady.

  2. 2 hours ago, RuffRob said:

    I think in this game we are going to have to be a little braver and have two up front whether than be  Maupay and Grey or Simms and Grey. So a 4-4-2 with Doucoure dropped to the bench. Again think our best bet in getting to the byline and trying to win plenty corners.  Get the big lads in the box for set pieces. Just be alert to fucking breaks and take a foul and yellow at the edge of their box if needed!!!

    I like this general idea.  I’m for dropping McNeil and Doucouré, replacing them with Gray and Maupay.  I’m still so angry at Coady’s unfathomable failure even to attempt to get a foot on the cross for that second goal, that I prefer he be replaced by any of Mina, Godfrey, Holgate, or even Keane.

    Go 4-1-3-2, hoping Simms/Maupay can get us a goal.  Gana, stay back as absolute sitting DCM.  If Gray is ineffective going forward, or is lazy getting back to help defend, replace him at halftime.

                                     Pickford

    Coleman     Mina/or?      Tarkowski         Mykolenko

                                         Gana

          Iwobi                     Onana                     Gray

                          Maupay                 Simms

     

  3. Fair to say we desperately need 10 points from next 5 matches.  That would give us 28 points from 27 matches, and give us a reasonable shot at 38-40 points.  Something dreadful like 2-3 points from next 5, and we’re done.  A mediocre 5-6 points, and we’re in big trouble.

    The Leeds match is a proverbial 6-pointer, and so a must win.

  4. It’s a running and passing game.  We’ve little pace and too frequently cannot make basic passes of intermediate length.

    Much more discouraging, we lack any semblance whatsoever, collectively and therefore for the most part individually, of the emotional attribute I most value in sports: relentlessness.

    We are the opposite of relentless.  Call it relentless-less.  We are too frequently a lethargic mental or physical mistake away from just giving away a goal or failing to pounce on an opportunity to score a goal.

    Maybe we’ll stay up.  Need 10 points from our next 5 matches, including 3 at Goodison and away to Forest.

  5. 8 minutes ago, Goodison Glory said:

    I actually blame McNeil for that goal. His attempt at a shot after the rebound was ridiculous. 

    There’s another reason to fault McNeil.  As Liverpool got the ball, McNeil was closer to the Everton goal at the other end of the pitch than Salah and 2 other Liverpool players.  But he was asleep-lazy, and very quickly was behind the 3 Liverpool players ripping toward the Everton goal.

    More generally, on Liverpool throw-ins, Liverpool are immediately ready, while several Everton players are asleep-lazy, looking down, strolling, unaware that Liverpool are ready for a quick throw-in.  It’s dismaying, our lack of alertness.

     

  6. 2 minutes ago, dunlopp9987 said:

    I actually see both sides of it. 

    The rule is that if you're falling and plant your arm (as you would if you're falling), it's not a penalty. 

    But, Soucek clearly denied a goal-scoring opportunity by doing so. 

    VAR is perpetually broken.

    I think the key point is that Soucek deliberately went down, rather than the normal understanding of “falling.”  He deliberately went down and deliberately deflected the ball.  I’ll be surprised if any commentator, after noting the rule you cite, doesn’t go on to say, “But he wasn’t really falling, so it’s a clear handball.”

    I don’t care one whit that Chelsea didn’t get the 3 points, but I care that WHam got a point.

  7. 4 minutes ago, dunlopp9987 said:

    So far nothing surprising about this in the least.

    Including, for me, the inability of too many players to make a basic pass of any distance.  We’ve been a very mediocre passing team for several years

    It’s a running and passing game.  We don’t have much pace and don’t pass even moderately well.

  8. 6 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

    Yeah nice to see. Our general open play focus seems to be crossing…. Not sure it’s the way. 

    I’m not sure, either, but not just because we don’t have any consistently good crossers.  My impression is we rarely have enough players in the box to receive the cross.  Corners are an obvious exception, and in this case Gray did deliver a perfect ball.  Onana hasn’t been good at heading, but this time he was.

  9. 2 hours ago, FairWooney said:

    Aren't press conferences dull!

    Only things we actually found out:

    DCL is in the squad

    Some of the players and manager are feeling a bit ill.

    Lampard says: “We’ve got a few people who are slightly unwell so we’ve got a few checks on that.”  Which means the only thing we actually learned is that DCL might play.  As for the rest of Lampard’s revelations, well, which people, with what maladies, and how seriously?

    Not, I admit, that it’s likely to matter, as it would be a shock if we manage even a point.  Need 6 from our next 2 matches at Goodison.  Or more than a few of us here are going to be more than slightly unwell.

×
×
  • Create New...