Jump to content

RuffRob

Members
  • Posts

    3,635
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

RuffRob last won the day on March 7

RuffRob had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Favourite Player
    Richarlison
  • Location
    Prestatyn
  • Nation
    Select a nation

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

RuffRob's Achievements

  1. I don't think the Johnson argument held any water as a mitigation factor in the final.judgement. The way I have read the judgement it is that Forest reduction from 6 points to 4 point is due only to the mitigating factor that Forest was being up front and basically admitted everything and rolled over to the PL and the commission. what annoys me in Forests judgement is it tries to make out that Everton where less than frank in our charge. However, in our appeal one of the two 9 points upheld was that the original hearing was wrong to state that Everton have been 'less than frank'. Forest appear to have 2 points (33%) knocked off their punishment for being frank.
  2. Reading Forest reaction to the judgment you can see they are very disappointed that the arse kissing grovelling approach to the PL didn't get them a zero points deduction. However, even Forest's response is cringingly asre kissing to the PL and commission. Is this what it's all coming down to.? Should 'small' clubs not stick up for themselves and fight their corner. How dare we!
  3. I agree, especially as we where pretty much the test case for this type of thing. As you read through it in more detail it appear to be that we have been well and truly screwed as 'the first' case. I feel a bit of a shit saying Forest should get more points (in fact part of the judgement says compared to our beach - 8 points would be pro rata punshment give the size of their breach), becasue I don't think us or them should get points taken off them, but it obviolsey effects our league position. We are just clubs battling to try and somehow compeate in this league. My gut feeling is they have been given a reduced sentance of 4 points to stop them appealing. Judgement hints at 8 points, charges them 6, and reduced in by 2 for Forest holding their hands up and being so co-operative.
  4. And this is how you get 2 points knocked of a 6 point punishment. You just have to bendover like a bitch to the Premiership!!! or have the advantage of not being the first to be screwed. 12.104 The Premier League agreed with the Appeal Board in the Everton Appeal, in that there is a level of cooperation that is reasonably expected by all clubs in the Premier League. In this case, it considers that Forest has indeed displayed a level of cooperation which is above the level reasonably expected. Forest has consistently indicated it intended to cooperate and has been very receptive to indications from the Premier League as to what would be required in this regard. Its cooperation commenced prior to the submission of its Annual Accounts at the end of December 2023 and has continued thereafter. By doing so, it has significantly reduced the costs of enforcement and assisted this Commission. It is desirable that such cooperation be recognised and given credit, both because it is deserved, and in order to create appropriate incentives for respondent clubs in future PSR cases. 12.105 The Commission agrees with the Premier League and commends Forest for its early plea and for the cooperative way it has conducted itself throughout this matter. Without this approach, it would not have been possible to conclude the process, including a two-day hearing, in just eight weeks from the Complaint. It is crucially important to the Premier League, all its clubs and the fans around the world that these types of matters are dealt with expeditiously, so the 18-Mar-24 42 competition can be concluded on the pitch.
  5. Forest breach was £34.5M on a £61M threshold - so 56% breach of the rules. Everton was £19.5M on £105M threshold - so 19% breach of the rules. Both fall in the 'signifcant breach' bracket apparently.
  6. basically saying Forest breach was bigger than ours, but both are significant. This judgement says it's not sure why Everton have 6 points, so they have assumed our total deduction must be becasue we tried to mislead. An interesting Extract of interest to us. "If the context was such and/or the quantum at the lower end of a significant breach, then the starting point might slide down the scale in terms of points and conversely, absent any contextual justification and/or with a higher quantum within the significant breach band, the starting point should slide upwards in terms of points. The Commission notes with Everton, there were a couple of factors that moved it up the scale to a starting point of six points - the size of the breach itself and what was initially termed as “misleading” the Premier League, but on appeal shown to be “incorrect” information being provided to the Premier League. 14.15 In the case at hand, the Commission considered whether there were any additional factors that should be taken into account - the “unique” position and/or the reasons for the excess. The conclusion was that these did not (nor were they mitigating factors, see above) and the only factor driving Forest up the scale will be the size of the breach. It was bigger than Everton’s, but both were in the “significant” breach band. However, there was no additional consideration around incorrect information being provided to the Premier League, as Everton had. The Commission does not know how the three extra points were arrived at by the Appeal Board for Everton, but some part of those three points must relate to the provision of incorrect information. Forest’s breach (not its losses, the Commission is concerned with the breach of the PSR Threshold) was larger than Everton’s and as a result, that alone slides it up the scale by three further points to a starting point of six points"
  7. I think they pretty much said that a points deduction is an appropriate punishment for a breach- and that 6 points was appropriate for our breach - but doing think it crystal clear that 6 points was a absolute minimum, becasue it sounded like you could claw points back for good things an offending club did. Maybe they did get 6, but reduce for 4 becasue they did have the intent to sell a player (it was just a few months late to maximise his sale value). It will all be very interesting to read.
  8. No offficial announcment on Forest's 4 points, so another leak if indeed true. It will be interesting to read the details that are written on this case once they are posted.
  9. Given we are in a bit of a flux with regards to ownership, I would be surprised if any such deal has been agreed. Especially if the is no FFP issues to address before the turn of the financial year in June.
  10. He seems to gets reasonable amount in the Championship - we got Championship level money for him. Good luck to the lad.
  11. all sounds like a bit of banter on a evening out. We all know from his press conference Dyche's banter is a bit hit or miss. I would guess a cheeky clip around the ear (maybe Patto had cheeky commnet of his own - he is surposed to be bit of a charater) Dyche is not blessed with finess, so a clip around ear felt more like a backhanded. players/captain happy and confident to say 'look gafer it was a bit much and a few players thought it was out of order or went a bit to far'. Dyche appears more than happy to apologies if upset or offended. The internal communication with each other looks spot on to me, rather than a group of simply bitching behind Dyches back. non story really.
  12. yeah, that's what I am lead to believe as well. I would guess any sort of 'exclusivity' for want of a better word (or maybe 'prefered buyer' might be more appropriate now), is most likely due to the money we are now borrowing through 777. all most likely based on Moshiri now get as much money back as possible and in the quickest possible time.
  13. with no game for us this weekend, Luton vs Forest and Burnley vs Bradford are the games that will have the biggest bearing on our league position. Not sure who I'll be routing for, as don't want really want to seen any of them pick up any points. draws would probably suit us best.
  14. Phew, glad its wasn't just me, I was being to feel a right c*nt for enjoying seeing Bournmouth comeback last night and take all the points.
×
×
  • Create New...