Romey 1878 Posted January 20, 2013 Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 At least Wallace wasnt out of contract so we got a fee for him and a nice big sell on clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 At least Wallace wasnt out of contract so we got a fee for him and a nice big sell on clause. how big a sell on clause? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted January 20, 2013 Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 how big a sell on clause? Very big if word is to be believed. And it's said it's a clause we ourselves will look to take advantage of if he fulfills his potential. I.e. we'll be able to buy him back for peanuts rather than have to she'll out millions a la Baines and Jags. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2013 Very big if word is to be believed. And it's said it's a clause we ourselves will look to take advantage of if he fulfills his potential. I.e. we'll be able to buy him back for peanuts rather than have to she'll out millions a la Baines and Jags. Thats sounds like a sensible bit of business from the board?! Bailey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hafnia Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 I'm keeping my eye on Wallace, I follow him on twitter and he seems a very level headed and footy focused lad. He is captain of rovers and clearly has some leadership attributes. If Phil Neville has made a career for himself in the top flightbased on leadership then anything is possible for this lad. He loves a tackle and puts a shift in. Lowensda, pete0, Quinn31 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.