pax Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Just looking at the odds and if it wasn't for Steve Kean i'd be all over Mancini to get the chop at 16-1 with Sky Bet. Got to be Kean, Warnock or Mancini surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 why do you say warnock? i agree about kean and mancini..especially the way city surrendered that lead yesterday and the man is so so negative it's a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 I'd go with Kean myself, massive mistake hiring him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pax Posted August 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 why do you say warnock? i agree about kean and mancini..especially the way city surrendered that lead yesterday and the man is so so negative it's a joke OPR, in terms of who their owners are, are the richest club in the world as far as i know. I'm pretty sure that a very poor start to the season could spell the end for Warnock as the owners will do everything in their power to keep the club in the premier league. I think knee jerk reactions and un-realistic targets are certainties with their board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 I'd go with Kean myself, massive mistake hiring him. this, but the mistake for me was having Venkys take over. I hate Blackburn so in my eyes, couldnt happen to a more deserving club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Warnock. Their mega rich board haven't backed him, and want to sell up. would have been better backing him to keep the club in the prem to keep the value up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codders78 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Kean for me. Mancini gone by end of season. A poor start by Villa would put Mcleish under pressure, the fans never wanted him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codders78 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 why do you say warnock? i agree about kean and mancini..especially the way city surrendered that lead yesterday and the man is so so negative it's a joke Shocking isnt it? Spend a fortune on all this attacking talent but so negative. The FA should implement a use it or lose it rule. You play shit football so we are taking Aguero away, you are stopping him fulfilling his destiny and here you go its Robbie Savage in return - or somebody else equally toilet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 that'd be an amazin rule..take away silva and you get stuart barlow out of retirement in return Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubecula Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Their mega rich board haven't backed him, and want to sell up. Is this true or just a theory? The reason I am asking is the fact that if they do want to sell up, either they are disenchanted with owning a football club, or they still want to own a club, just not QPR. They may be looking at buying into another club entirely. At least they may be if this is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 look how much they have spent this year, i think its around £1m. they clearly have more cash than most but not spending. Warnock had a bit of a moan about it but shut up now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.