Jump to content
IGNORED

ANTI RIOT SQUADS - your views?


Avinalaff

Recommended Posts

What do you think about these 'anti riot squads' in Enfield etc, patrolling the streets?

 

Is this really an effort to stop rioters, or is it just an opportunity to kick some ass?

 

No way do normal lads get that kind of crew together, outside of organised groups, so are they E.D.L and is it an opportunity for racist revenge?

 

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think about these 'anti riot squads' in Enfield etc, patrolling the streets?

Is this really an effort to stop rioters, or is it just an opportunity to kick some ass?

No way do normal lads get that kind of crew together, outside of organised groups, so are they E.D.L and is it an opportunity for racist revenge?

What do you think?

Obviously some there to look out for the community, but mostly footy fans making sure the game goes a head and footy hooligans who would be happy to give a kickin' win all round.

Edited by pete0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with good people defending their own streets, to take it away from the racist angle the first people to defend themselves from the riots were the foreign communities in London and Birmingham.

The likes of the uprising in Enfield have my support, so long as it is to get rid of the pricks causing the trouble, and the them pricks get hurt well that's just a bit of rough justice for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Personally i took that as being, "how can you call yourself ENglish if you're looting and rioting in your own country" and "it's not what the English do"

 

That's very generous of you I feel. I look at it more as though he meant " guys who aren't English are rioting in England".

 

The last thing we need is mobs dealing out justice to kids, or anyone else that matter. If they scare the rioters off, then great, but if they attack the rioters, not great.

 

My initial sentiment was to just wade in and knock hell out of them, but then I realised most are young gullible kids who have been involved through peer pressure more than anything.

 

It's the leaders that need the kicking, but the leaders are probably organised gangs anyway, so in that respect, let both organised nutters go find a big hole and jump in.

 

The same country that made it illegal to smack our kids now want mums and dads to discipline them and keep them in. Bit ironic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's very generous of you I feel. I look at it more as though he meant " guys who aren't English are rioting in England".

 

The last thing we need is mobs dealing out justice to kids, or anyone else that matter. If they scare the rioters off, then great, but if they attack the rioters, not great.

 

My initial sentiment was to just wade in and knock hell out of them, but then I realised most are young gullible kids who have been involved through peer pressure more than anything.

 

It's the leaders that need the kicking, but the leaders are probably organised gangs anyway, so in that respect, let both organised nutters go find a big hole and jump in.

 

The same country that made it illegal to smack our kids now want mums and dads to discipline them and keep them in. Bit ironic?

Discipline doesnt have to be physical so i dont see the irony at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mum and dad were telling me they should bring back the Cain, before they remembered that if a parent can't give a kid a smack then a teacher has no chance.

The threat of a smack from my mum was always enough as a kid. Had no idea what dad would do if I stepped out of line so I made sure I never found out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, I would pick a smack over the 'i'm not mad am jus disappointed speech' any day.

that used to make me sick! Another one was 1 word - "fine", said in a very distinct way which basically meant the same as i'm not mad am jus disappointed'.

 

That cut deeper than anything physical

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discipline doesnt have to be physical so i dont see the irony at all.

 

So you would prefer it to be psychological then as opposed to physical?

 

The whole point is about deterrent. The irony is that the government removed long established deterrents but then complains when the kids are without discipline. Whether we feel the deterrents are right or wrong is another subject.

 

We didn't 'have' to smack our kids, as long as the kids knew we could. The teachers didn't 'have' to give the cane, providing the kids knew they could.

 

The whole dilemma is that now kids know they can't be touched. Add to that the insufficient numbers of police officers and it's easy to anticipate folk taking advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So you would prefer it to be psychological then as opposed to physical?

 

The whole point is about deterrent. The irony is that the government removed long established deterrents but then complains when the kids are without discipline. Whether we feel the deterrents are right or wrong is another subject.

 

We didn't 'have' to smack our kids, as long as the kids knew we could. The teachers didn't 'have' to give the cane, providing the kids knew they could.

 

The whole dilemma is that now kids know they can't be touched. Add to that the insufficient numbers of police officers and it's easy to anticipate folk taking advantage.

i agree that the smacking thing shouldnt have been banned (the cane seemed extreme) but my argument is that just because it was doesnt mean kids cant be disciplined. I was never physically punished as a kid and ive never broken the law, work hard etc. Any punishment was purely physiological (which doesnt mean physiological abuse). Actually, just remembered that our history teacher used to make us sit on the heating pipe in front of the class if we did something wrong! It was more the being at the front of the class on show that was the deterrent than the pipe though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yesterday, they had sunday court sessions going on in some places to process the numbers through

 

They did indeed, my old escorting job gave me a call and I had to take some of the little bastards to some secure units. Kids like, i genuinely think that they're going harder on the kids than the adults this time around!

 

The sunday courts were only open as a 'show your face in court asap, then receive your sentance in the coming weeks'. Most of the lads had their court dates set for this weeek, i think they've done the Sunday court just to set dates and have them banged up quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...