markjazzbassist

de bruyne the world beater he was a Wolfsburg. what a win for man city in CL. bet mou is missing his presence on his squad now.

yeah agreed. glad we have those type of clauses in the youngsters contracts, great incentive for them and good pay structure for us.

agreed mccarthy needs a rest and a benching. barry has been solid this year. i would like to see besic over mccarthy if we stick with 2 sitters.

great news mike!

yeah here you just pay off the right politicians and have the permit next day. gotta be someone on the city council looking to build an addition to the house or have another holiday

thanks patto, wow pienaar back from the dead. glad to hear cleverley back to 60 min. we will need him his is pienaar 2.0.

they played a full strength lineup so let's hope they rotate for our match or their starters are tired.

damn you english work slow!!! shit 2-3 years tops here in the states.

good on them, the more i read about that club the more i like them.

i'm not saying that had anything to do with city. i'm just saying if i'm a new owner i would see that as a better opportunity to make it whatever i wanted not what the previous regime wanted. that's a personal opinion

mate you obviously do not work in finance. they are only looking at perceived value compared to actual value compared to potential value. this is driven by balance sheets. the scenario you list above would only be if Carlos Slim (richest man in the world) wanted an english football club and didn't give a shit about investment/asset management in which case we don't want them as an owner because we need someone who treats us as a business and its ran well. the players are most certainly assets because they along with the manager are how we stay up and get higher position, granted those assets are replaced/sold frequently but it doesn't change their value to the balance sheet. not having a stadium is actually a positive selling point because the new owner can build it and pimp it however they want (sell naming rights, sell stand name rights, have a million billboards, etc.) to make themselves more money without upsetting the current trend (no naming rights anywhere). plus that is a great way to instantly create more value for the club in valuation perspective for when they sell. transfermarkt feel free to negate but the echo report is from "That’s the conclusion of a new report on football finance from Dr Tom Markham, a lecturer and expert in financial profiling in football who has advised buyers and sellers of football clubs on valuation." he knows what he's talking about and puts us at 216m.

mc i posted the transfermarkt value, you have posted before how you think they are pretty solid in their valuations of players. look fulham sold for 200m and then dropped. we are a mid-table to upper midtable side, a new owner doesn't have to fear the drop and loss of investment. a new stadium isn't a big deal really, the new owner would own it and make gobs of money off that as well. with the new TV deals Everton could become a cash cow for someone. Not only that but we have a rich history that these millionaire/billionaire's would love to brag about at the country club.

Tim is what brought me to Everton, i love him for USA but not lately for Everton. He's past it and we need a new keeper. Sadly Joel doesn't seem to be getting much traction so maybe the likes of Kruul if Newcastle go down or Ospina if we can pry him from Arsenal.

i would too Howard Coleman Stones Jags Baines Barry/Mccarthy (if he decides he's up for it this campaign) Barkley Cleverley Gerry Lukaku Mirallas go for the throat go for the kill

Great article and it makes a lot of sense. If the 225 is correct its 10m off the standard valuation and 17m off transfermarkt I posted. That's not far from a negotiating standpoint and could be bridged fairly easily. I have hope bill will get this done before his health declines further.

We'll never see a winger again. Be Kone and clev out on the wings with naisy mixed in. Mirallas Lennon Gerry will ride the pine as we lose more matches. I'm sure of it.

agreed he has been awful this season, might be worth giving besic a shot once he's healthy.

above the relegation zone on goal difference, despite you wanting to stay davie i fear they will sack you sooner than later. back to the premier league i think you will be. http://www.espnfc.us/real-sociedad/story/2670765/david-moyes-wants-to-stay-at-real-sociedad

sorry mate just frustrated with the team you know.

great question dunc, i did some digging here are some valuations http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/liverpool-valued-540m-latest-finance-9907010 216m pounds http://www.transfermarkt.com/premier-league/startseite/wettbewerb/GB1 208m pounds in response to your question i would say 225 is fine, they need to make some money they are businessmen.

http://www.espnfc.us/story/2671161/brendan-galloway-set-for-new-everton-contract-sources getting your wish it seems matt

might as well just forfeit with that logic geth. can't win at arsenal play the youngsters and save the energy for the cup match at home. FFS we either need to attack and be english barcalona or defend and re-hire david moyes. we can't just bottle it up whenever the big boys come and then try and be all pretty when we play milwall. arsenal is expecting us to pack the midfield like everyone else does, it will catch them off guard to attack the shit out of them and go for the win away. sadly it will be the time honored 4231 with no wingers and no win.

doesn't mean you can't vote the other way mate. but glad i got a rise outta you, now relax amigo. maybe it was crusty mistaking it for howard? paddock back from holiday?

http://www.espnfc.us/story/2670688/chelsea-boss-mourinho-scouting-ukraine-stars-lucescu chelsea might be after him now, mou watching his ukraine match

probably romey having a go