Sibdane

May have been offside but not even close to being on target. 

Patterson just seems to snatch at everything. Does not look very calm right now. 

Should be comfortably in the lead but instead we’re chasing the game… again. 

Fuck off. 

How are we not winning this? So many chances. 

Slick by Garner. 

Rewatching Doucouré hit the keeper when he could’ve squared to Garner for an open net shot really gets me. We should be up right now. Just hoping we can carry the momentum into the next half. 

How many chances is that for Maupay now? 

Just now, badaids said:

If that was allowed to stand against us we'd go batshit.

Tarks stood his ground. Leno jumped into him and lost the ball on his own. 

Bullshit refereeing again. 

Great chance. Feel like it should be a goal. 

On 08/08/2023 at 13:28, Sibdane said:

Everton 2-2 Fulham 

DCL

Change to Doucouré. 

DCL not even on the bench? 

12-15th. 

1 hour ago, SpartyBlue said:

I don’t think we do/will have a worse squad than last year. So often we just think in terms of additions. Players like Garner, Onana, McNeil, Patterson are very likely going to be better and that boosts the squad. It’s also likely we get more out of DCL. We have more stability in management. 

Our problem is depth. It's fine and well if these players get better, but we're a couple of injuries away from having an extremely weak starting 11. DCL's injury spells have shown that over the last couple of seasons. Add in the fatigue that comes with the PL, and then we're really testing our luck. If we fail to increase numbers (and any new numbers fail to adapt) we're absolutely in the same position (or worse) as we were last year. 

14 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said:

Signed for Luton.

I don't know why, but I hate it. Don't want him here though. 

Everton 2-2 Fulham 

DCL

2 minutes ago, RPG said:

I am sure he will but the point I am making is that any appeal will be stronger if he can show that political leanings of the judge (as evidenced by her previous harsher than recommended sentencing on others involved in the Capitol riots) affected both the outcome of the trial and the sentence. Similarly, the location of the trial may also be cited as being impartial. If the prosecution remove those arguments from him, have they not disarmed him in advance?

I don't think it should be moved. As far as a harsher-than-recommended sentencing for the Capital riots goes, who is to say how harsh they are relative to other sentencings when something like that hadn't happened before, at least in modern US history? Either way, you're using one scenario to justify why it should be moved in order to give your guy a better shot at not being convicted -- normal. If the US justice systems works, then the judge will be impartial and the jury will make a decision based on the facts and information presented. 

I don't plan to respond anymore though. I'm over talking about Trump, and he'll get his day (again and again) in court. He's a stain on democracy, and anyone who defends him and the damage he's done to my country isn't worth the time. 

3 hours ago, RPG said:

We will have to see how it plays out but I do think the prosecution is already offering Trump grounds for appeal if he is convicted. Surely it would be better, from a prosecution pov, to nip that in the bud now by changing the judge and trial location.

He will appeal if he loses no matter the circumstances. 

44 minutes ago, RPG said:

And that is also why Trump is allowed to defend himself.

Yes… that’s right. Good job. 

8 hours ago, RPG said:

I wouldn't try to deny you your right to an opinion, but that is all it is.

No shit. That’s why we go to court to prove otherwise. 

11 minutes ago, RPG said:

Then, if you believe in justice, you believe that Trump is innocent until proven guilty, don't you?

At the moment, in a legal sense, he is innocent until proven guilty. I do, however, have the personal opinion that he is guilty based on the information and facts that are currently out there. There can be a distinction without compromising “justice.” 
 

27 minutes ago, RPG said:

So, what do you suggest - not bother with the trial and go straight to the lynching?

No, we go to trial as that is the way. Never did I say we shouldn’t. 

If you can’t see Trump is guilty then you’re bonkers. That’s really all there is to say. 

2 hours ago, dunlopp9987 said:

I haven't been this pumped for a season two of a show in a long time. It was one of the most original, thrilling things I've seen.

Agree on so many levels. It was fantastic and ended on a perfect cliff hanger. Way better than I expected. I'll probably rewatch it right before season 2 comes out.