duncanmckenzieismagic

I’m staring to think you are on the wind up now
Spurs have one of the best stadiums in world football and are in a dream location in London but haven’t secured a naming rightsdeal in over 5 years,But it’s savvy business acumen because they are waiting for the right deal
Yet for Everto
 I’ve said it before and I will say it again, I can not believe we haven’t after 2 years not found a replacement sponsor for the stadium and the training ground, honestly what the fuck is going on within our club, if we could have found someone who only paid 20% of what USM were paying for naming rights we could have generated 40 million, and if we could have found someone to pay 50% of what USM were paying for sponsorship towards Finch Farm that could have generated somewhere in the region of 20 million a yea
 
Since Spurs have been looking for the right deal  we have bought a dock, filled it in, nearly completed a 3 year project to build a stadium, sold first option on naming rights for £30m , fielded interest from people interested because we are looking for the right deal and secured a £200m deal then fielded more interest as that fell through due to the war in Ukraine
 

Do you even like football?

Absolutely crucial. Fulham is just the type of team we need to beat, so let's hope we won't tire at the end because of first team players playing twice in quick succession.
I was really hoping that Sheffield United would hold on for a 2-2 tie and then win in the replay. They don't have the squad depth to focus on both the league and the cup. The same is true of Luton, though, so today's loss does have a silver lining.

Amazing how Everton obliged and granted your wish so soon! 👍
Unfortunately, we won't be winning many of the remaining league fixtures with performances as abject as that.
File me under 'a trifle concerned'. 

Refer you back to Spurs who actually do have the best stadium in the country and the added bonus of being London and it’s been a lot longer

I can’t believe you think it’s that easy to find a stadium sponsor especially as it’s not even built yet, just ask Spurs!
So explain to me what happens if the appeals committee sides with Everton on the loan interest being permissible or that they can’t change the rules part way through the process and stadium build?
If they are taken out of the equation then we are comfortably compliant in both reporting periods and so there is no case to answer  and therefore we are not guilty. Or am I missing something?
The two charges are intrinsically linked because they cover 75% of the same accounts/ reporting periods and it’s already been pointed out by top barristers that this goes against natural justice

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such
We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument
I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel  that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that
Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history?
The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

Refer you back to Spurs who actually do have the best stadium in the country and the added bonus of being London and it’s been a lot longer

If they are going to throw the game they should tell the fans before the tickets go on sale

I can’t believe you think it’s that easy to find a stadium sponsor especially as it’s not even built yet, just ask Spurs!
So explain to me what happens if the appeals committee sides with Everton on the loan interest being permissible or that they can’t change the rules part way through the process and stadium build?
If they are taken out of the equation then we are comfortably compliant in both reporting periods and so there is no case to answer  and therefore we are not guilty. Or am I missing something?
The two charges are intrinsically linked because they cover 75% of the same accounts/ reporting periods and it’s already been pointed out by top barristers that this goes against natural justice

I can’t believe you think it’s that easy to find a stadium sponsor especially as it’s not even built yet, just ask Spurs!
So explain to me what happens if the appeals committee sides with Everton on the loan interest being permissible or that they can’t change the rules part way through the process and stadium build?
If they are taken out of the equation then we are comfortably compliant in both reporting periods and so there is no case to answer  and therefore we are not guilty. Or am I missing something?
The two charges are intrinsically linked because they cover 75% of the same accounts/ reporting periods and it’s already been pointed out by top barristers that this goes against natural justice

If they are going to throw the game they should tell the fans before the tickets go on sale

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such
We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument
I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel  that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that
Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history?
The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

https://tbrfootball.com/frank-lampard-admits-he-was-stunned-by-how-good-one-amazing-everton-player-was/
Is it universally accepted that he is a great captain these days or do some still think he is a shit captain?

I’m all for 777 throwing in a £350M bid for Godfrey to stave off FFP, they probably wouldn’t actually pay it anytime soon but at least we could cook the books!
 

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such
We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument
I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel  that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that
Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history?
The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

If they are going to throw the game they should tell the fans before the tickets go on sale

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such
We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument
I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel  that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that
Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history?
The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

Clearly you are not going to be swayed from your opinion no matter what but I don’t think we have pleaded guilty as such
We have acknowledged the fact we have gone over the allowable £105m loss barrier over the 4 seasons BUT the main point of the article is that we have only breached because they moved the goal posts regarding the interest on the loans . That is the whole crux of the argument
I thought you asked why people believed the first appeal would affect the second charge? Well this is your answer, if we can convince the appeal panel  that the loans should have continued to be allowed as add backs then we would be comfortably compliant and therefore not guilty and as the second charge is for 75% of the same accounting period the same would apply to that
Yes we are also contesting the severity, and rightly so. The other mitigating factors I also believe are credible. How can they justify saying on one hand that there was no intended wrong doing and no sporting advantage gained then on the other hit us with any sporting sanction at all let alone the most severe in history?
The club have worked openly with the EPL since 2021 and can clearly evidence all the efforts they have done to remain compliant so to be hit with such a severe penalty is entirely unjust and it’s quite obvious to most that that they are trying to use us as the sacrificial lamb to prove to the Government that an independent regulator is not needed

Full strength please. Keep rebuilding the momentum and move past that poor run for good.

Give some key players an important break before a crucial league match next week.
                        Virginia
Patterson   Keane   Godfrey   Mykolenko
                    Onana   Garner
Harrison          Danjuma              McNeil
                           Beto

@Palfy

I’ve heard it’s because he can get better dental veneers in Saudi Arabia 🐴🪥🦷

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/sean-dyche-right-transfers-not-28504800
All The more reason that we should not have received any sporting sanction