duncanmckenzieismagic
-
Posts
15,990 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
238
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by duncanmckenzieismagic
-
-
-
4 hours ago, Palfy said:
The only true way to make an even playing field is to have price caps on fees and wages, which has to be agreed by all football governing bodies worldwide.
That would never happen in the EPL because a level playing field would damage the brand
- dunlopp9987, plaidharper and Matt
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
It’s FFP/PSR doing exactly what it’s designed to do. 14 clubs having to sell their best players on the cheap to keep compliant and the other 6 clubs at the top cherry picking players they want to stockpile
It makes sure all teams keep in their lane and ensures the Sky 6 continue to get richer and richer on the back of reward payments and Sky money
- plaidharper, Palfy, Matt and 5 others
-
8
-
5 hours ago, FairWooney said:
I think you have.
He might have been ok early on but I thought he'd lost his way a bit before he got subbed, a few wildly bad passes across the pitch which luckily fell into empty space.
He has overall been playing well though and it's probably the one area where there is a tough decision in picking who to start. Onana isn't as strong as Gueye at winning the ball back and shielding the defense but Onana is much better on the ball and will bring it forward as well as winning it back at times. I'd have liked to have seen Onana come on a bit earlier in this game to provide a bit more quality bringing the ball out.
Most people around me were very confused by the decision to take Gueye off as he was comfortably our best player up to that point
Can only assume Dyche said get Garner off and amid the confusion they got the wrong Gana
- Romey 1878, Palfy, Wiggytop and 1 other
-
4
-
1 hour ago, Shukes said:
Going to be wildly unpopular here, but I’m changing my mind and thinking let’s cash in.
I know he scored last night, but was it just me that thought he just slowed us down? He will only ever play a safe pass, never tries to thread it through. He is just so safe it slows our impetus down. If we could get 70 for him, I would snap there hands off.
And now we have Garner. I think Garner is going to be Gana’s replacement, or could be if we cashed in on Onana.
I thought the complete opposite, I thought Garner was forever playing sideways and backwards all night and we lost control of the midfield
Then Onana came on and did start moving us forwards and picking the right passes and we then started winning the midfield back and controlling the game
-
-
1 hour ago, Romey 1878 said:
I know he had a couple of opportunities last night but I do feel sorry for him at the minute because he's got a thankless task up front for us right now.
We are just twatting the ball up to him and hoping he can win it and then... what? Players aren't getting around him well enough. Last night he won 17 out of 20 duels - that's top work. But how many times did we support him after he's done that? We were slow to every second ball, really lethargic.
He needs to score, no doubt about that, but the rest of the players (midfield) need to help him. Whether that's being brave with the ball or being aggressive out of possession.
Totally agree with all of that but thought it was a typical DCL performance. His all round game was very good but he can’t finish. Those two headers he missed were both sitters
- Romey 1878 and Formby
-
2
-
When the deduction first dropped I wasn't really arsed because we were playing well and scoring freely, I just saw it as a false position in the table as we did not look like a bottom 3 side
But then because the squad is wafer thin a few injuries combined with a tough set of fixtures has completely derailed us
Suddenly we do look like a side that is fighting relegation . There is a very anxious atmosphere in the ground and it's clearly effecting the players
Nobody wants the ball and we are snatching at chances
I think the appeal verdict will dictate whether or not we are a Premier League side next season -
Just had this email, can’t even remember the last time I actually sat in my seat !
As we approach the final seven home games of the 2023/24 season, I wanted to take this opportunity to write to you as a Season Ticket Member in the Howard Kendall Lower Gwladys Street with some important safety information.
The content of this email is not aimed at dampening the passion or fervour of the matchday atmosphere. In fact, we actively encourage fans to show their passion for the team, as that support plays a vital role in the matchday experience and the connection between the crowd and our players on the pitch.
I should also stress that, in sending this letter to highlight certain regulated issues, I appreciate they may not apply to you directly. However, your understanding of this important information is valued.
Following recent inspections by Liverpool City Council licensing officers and The Sports Ground Safety Authority - the body responsible for the issuing of licences to sports grounds for all football matches played in England and Wales - the issue of 'persistent standing' in the Lower Gwladys Street stand has been formally highlighted to the football club.
As a condition of our license, the Club must be rigorous in upholding the all-seater conditions of the Football Spectators Act 1989, the purpose of which is "to provide for the safety of spectators". In addition to this, some of our supporters in these areas have complained to the Club because they simply cannot stand for long periods due to age and/or health problems – or because they are unable to see if they are located at the back of the stand.
We fully understand that, at times of increased excitement, supporters will stand. However, we urge all supporters to continue to be considerate in their actions. The potential exists for the licensing authorities to reduce the capacity in the Lower Gwladys Street stand should the situation not improve. Similar action has previously been taken in the away section at Goodison Park, where capacity reductions have been imposed for certain opposition teams.
As a Club, we are legally compelled to work with the authorities to identify any individuals who take part in persistent standing. This also applies to the throwing of objects of any description on to the field of play.
Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to punishment for the Club or a partial closure of the stadium to supporters.
You may have seen our advice cards during the season. These cards were distributed as part of our responsibility to ensure we are compliant with our license. The Club appreciates the understanding and positive feedback we have received, and many supporters have been more appreciative and considerate of others. However, it is also evident that many fans have not responded to our efforts to improve matters. The last thing we want is a capacity reduction for our final season at Goodison.
As we look forward to the move to Everton Stadium, I should advise that there will be a dedicated safe standing area in the lower section of the stadium’s south stand. Fans who wish to stand for long periods will be able to do so in this area of our new home. However, until we move, it is important that all supporters appreciate it is imperative we comply and adhere fully with the ground regulations.
I look forward to your understanding and co-operation during the remainder of the season and, as always, my team will be busy ensuring all supporters have the best possible matchday experience at Goodison Park.
Kind regards,
Dave Lewis
Head of Security and Stadium Safety -
29 minutes ago, Formby said:
I don't think it's an agenda against us because we're Everton per se (although it often seems that way), but I do think it's an agenda to stick a punishment on us because we don't have the clout to fight back. A historically significant club fallen on hard times, bereft of a board, struggling on the pitch - let's demonstrate how tough we are by clobbering them. Maybe the others will sit up and take note.
The PL would not be doing this with either of the Manchester clubs, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea.
I’m convinced there is an agenda for precisely the reasons you have just stated, we are big enough to make an example of but not big enough to damage the brand if they kick us out
-
-
2 hours ago, Formby said:
I think all eyes are on the PL at the moment, so this isn't going to get buried. I do think it will be after the Palace game, though - for obvious reasons.
Indeed but if they are scared of a backlash the same applies, issue the news Friday evening when it’s too late for the Friday papered and by the weekend all the actual sports reports will be occupying the back pages and by Monday it will be old news
-
From The Athletic today
Listen closely and you might just be able to hear the sound of a can being kicked down the road again.
It is five months since 777 Partners agreed a takeover deal for Everton and still we await clarity on whether their bid will gain approval. In a statement announcing the agreement in September, the club said that they expected closure before the end of 2023, with a guideline of 12 weeks cited.
We are now in week 22 and there is still no word. Meanwhile, Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s deal to purchase 25 per cent of Manchester United, agreed just before Christmas, has already been given the go-ahead.
Those close to the process on all sides are quick to point out that these are two vastly different deals. One is for a smaller shareholding and involves a well-known businessman; the other concerns the takeover of a whole club by what some would argue is a relatively opaque American group – one that has had its fair share of negative publicity at that.
While there may be disagreement on the above categorisation of 777 and its affiliates, nobody – certainly not Evertonor those working on behalf of the Miami-based organisation – disputes that basic difference when it comes to the two cases.
But patience is, nevertheless, wearing thin – and has been for some time.
777 gained approval from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in December, while assent from the Football Association has long been considered a formality. All that remains for the group is to pass the league’s recently beefed up owners’ and directors’ test (OADT), ran by lawyer Peter McCormick — a final, but considerable, hurdle.
Since FCA sign-off before Christmas, though, there has been little evidence of progress.
Initial soundings from 777 suggested they expected a takeover to be wrapped up by mid-January. When that did not happen, focus shifted again to the end of January. Pressed on Everton’s situation by the Culture, Media and Sport select committee in Westminster last month, Premier League CEO Richard Masters said the 777 approvals process would be a matter of “weeks, hopefully”.
“Unfortunately, some processes take a matter of weeks; some, if we haven’t had satisfactory answers to the questions we have asked, it takes a lot longer,” he added.
Now the feeling — perhaps, hope — is that clarity is likely to come before the month is out.
It is already long overdue.
With the takeover ongoing, monthly losses to cover, a costly stadium project to fund and Farhad Moshiri no longer footing the bill, Everton have been left on life support. Loans from 777, supplied as junior debt with the intention of being turned to equity on completion of the takeover, will soon total £190million. The money is for working capital to meet everyday needs, and new stadium bills.
The longer this drags out, the higher the bill will be. There is risk for 777, too, as it would be behind other creditors in the queue should their deal not gain approval.
It is becoming increasingly hard for anyone involved to understand the league’s delay in making a decision. There has also been confusion over the process and how it works.
More prevarication only makes the situation worse and there was frustration when the league appeared to shut down for around two weeks over Christmas, leading to a further, unwanted delay.
777 maintains that the relevant paperwork was submitted before Christmas, but there has been something of an infrequent back and forth since, with the league occasionally asking them for clarity and responses duly provided.
Those queries are understood to centre on the nature of its business and how it makes money, with the OADT also assessing 777’s three-year plan for the club. 777 is yet to be summoned to officials, usually one of the final steps before a decision is made but is expecting more clarity on timelines in the next week.
Following a swift OADT, the Premier League’s board approved Manchester United’s investment last week. As will happen with Everton’s case, it was then up to an independent oversight panel to review the decision. That part of the process took less than a week for Ratcliffe, but has raised eyebrows elsewhere.
There is a suspicion that with the league strained elsewhere (PSR cases, anyone?) and increasingly under the microscope, officials have been keen to show they have done due diligence and will not allow situations like the one that saw Portsmouth enter into administration in 2010.
They would point out, no doubt, that this is an early challenge for the new OADT and that the 12-week guideline could only ever be a loose estimate. Takeovers are judged on a case-by-case basis, with the Newcastle process taking around 18 months in total.
Perhaps part of their reticence is the fact that 777 has been the subject of sustained negative publicity. There have been stories about other clubs in their stable being late on payments to players and peers, temporary transfer bans and a series of high-profile lawsuits filed against them in the US. These are understandable concerns.
On the flip side, some at Everton point to 777’s commitment to keeping the club afloat while the process runs its course. It has honoured promises over funds and provided money when it is needed.
In truth, the more pressing issue is less about whether 777 should be approved and more about the need for a speedy resolution whichever way it goes.
Fans and club staff deserve answers, particularly those whose livelihoods are tied to Everton’s fortunes. The January transfer window, which could have been an opportunity either to strengthen post-takeover or bring in funds in the event of 777 being rejected, has already come and gone.
The delay risks a situation where Everton are up the creek without a paddle.
Yes, the upcoming PSR appeal verdict is important for Everton. But this is arguably even more vital when it comes to the club’s long-term future.
It’s time for answers, Mr Masters.
-
It’s widely acknowledged that if you want to bury news you release it late on a Friday so fully expecting that to happen, either this week or next
-
-
-
-
11 hours ago, Zoo 2.0 said:
I've thought from the beginning (and still do) that no points will be returned. Giving anything back would admit fault on the Premier League's side and that's just not going to happen.
I would honestly be amazed if that was the case, I’m not expecting all of the points back but I’m certain we will get some back
-
-
9 hours ago, Romey 1878 said:
You could be right but I get so fucked off with how often Harrison gives up possession. I really thought we getting a better technical player than what we've seen but it honestly feels like he loses it every time he gets it (I'm sure it's not that often but it's how it feels).
I like him as a lad and he's a hard worker but he's a shite winger. I think it's exacerbated by the fact we've got a shite winger on the left as well. You can probably get away with having one that is essentially a wide midfielder masquerading as a winger but we've got two of them, and our game plan really revolves around getting it wide and then getting the ball in the box but that requires them beating their man and neither one can do it.
We own McNeil so he's not going anywhere but we have the option to not make the mistake of signing Harrison. There must be a cheaper player on the continent or in the lower leagues that is an actual winger. Over to you Thelwell.
I like him and think he is very underrated. He has 6 goal contributions in 18 games, so 1 in 3, which is pretty good for a player in this Everton side on the run were on
Not to mention he is also been playing out of position for a chunk of those games
He also puts a shift in every game and is very much a Dyche type player
Personally for the reported £20m fee I will be very disappointed if we don’t sign him permanently
-
-
-
Read the full thread!
- Romey 1878, Matt and Gwlad
-
3
-
Sean Dyche
in General Everton Discussion
Posted
Not sure where you are going with this, it’s like tying someone’s hands behind their back then criticising them for not being able to throw a punch