Jump to content
IGNORED

The GLBT debate


Matt

Recommended Posts

If you were born, were told shagging men was normal the chances are there would be a large portion of people doing it. Society accepting homosexuality increases the number of people doing it as they don't believe they are doing anything wrong. There might be a natural inkling to be gay, I won't deny that but not wanting the opposite sex isn't natural, it goes against nature's laws.

 

Wouldn't "nature's law" tell you that it's wrong then, since it goes against your natural instinct?

 

Since you're apart of a society that generally accepts gays then why aren't you out trying to pick up some dudes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if gay was a choice then why would there be so much repressed behaviour by gay people who struggle to accept what they are for the reason they have been forced to believe it's wrong?

 

it's ridiculous to suggest that all these poor sods who have lived lies and got married etc "chose" to be gay after years of self torment.

 

we had Gareth Thomas the rugby player come into work to talk about his struggle with accepting who he was, extremely upsetting and to be honest would change the mind of anyone who says homosexuality is wrong or chosen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest blueboy122

if gay was a choice then why would there be so much repressed behaviour by gay people who struggle to accept what they are for the reason they have been forced to believe it's wrong?

it's ridiculous to suggest that all these poor sods who have lived lies and got married etc "chose" to be gay after years of self torment.

we had Gareth Thomas the rugby player come into work to talk about his struggle with accepting who he was, extremely upsetting and to be honest would change the mind of anyone who says homosexuality is wrong or chosen

I am sure there are some dreadful stories but I still don't believe in it however if that's what people choose than fine.

 

I accept it but can't agree with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't really explain it's just a natural instinct for me not to agree with it, like you will find something's unacceptable that I find acceptable just different views.

that is perfectly reasonable in my opinion, and the best way you've phrased your beliefs

Their beliefs aren't what should be discriminated against, it's their destructive actions.

 

You have to be able to separate their Islamic identity and their violent nature. Some seem to confuse the two, especially here in the USA. Their beliefs may lead to their actions, but I honestly think that they are they way they are because of the environment they come from and that they're are misinformed about those who they attack. They target, for example, a group of people from a government that has an ideology that differs from their own, but the people may not actually be that different in nature. In my opinion, they are a corrupt group who brainwashes others into thinking that "infidels" deserve to die, while a great proportion of the Islamic community does not feel this way; they are more aggressive and louder than their counterparts, so they are more likely to be heard. But, I digress....

 

It's okay to be uncomfortable around homosexuals, but I thought the "mental illness" comment was a little insensitive.

 

again, good argument

I accept it but can't agree with it.

again, well put.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were born, were told shagging men was normal the chances are there would be a large portion of people doing it. Society accepting homosexuality increases the number of people doing it as they don't believe they are doing anything wrong. There might be a natural inkling to be gay, I won't deny that but not wanting the opposite sex isn't natural, it goes against nature's laws.

 

It's important to remember that being gay is not about having sex Zoo. Sex is simply sex. Being gay is a response to the instructions of your own dna. The body is an amazing thing, and changes during puberty for example can totally shift a persons fruition.

 

Whether we think it is right or wrong is irrelevant, but to suggest it isn't natural is wrong, as we are not in a position to change our course. There are millions of men leading lives that conform to the popular path, having sex with women, and raising families and so on, that are denying their actual preferences because of the stigma attached, and the same goes for women.

 

What is most important in my opinion is to judge people as individuals, and allow each individual their own personality and their own destiny, without categorizing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest blueboy122

Only for the last twenty years or so. Doesn't explain why people have been gay since people have existed.

That's a fair point, weren't the Romans gay obviously not all... There is evidence of homosexuality dating back even before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest blueboy122

It's important to remember that being gay is not about having sex Zoo. Sex is simply sex. Being gay is a response to the instructions of your own dna. The body is an amazing thing, and changes during puberty for example can totally shift a persons fruition.

 

Whether we think it is right or wrong is irrelevant, but to suggest it isn't natural is wrong, as we are not in a position to change our course. There are millions of men leading lives that conform to the popular path, having sex with women, and raising families and so on, that are denying their actual preferences because of the stigma attached, and the same goes for women.

 

What is most important in my opinion is to judge people as individuals, and allow each individual their own personality and their own destiny, without categorizing them.

Shame you didn't say that an hour ago rather than wading in with a wooden spoon acting 10 men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shame you didn't say that an hour ago rather than wading in with a wooden spoon acting 10 men.

 

BB, Why don't you read back, and realise you reacted over my asking why a conversation had gone from rainbow lace wearing footballers to lesbian porn? You yourself had questioned it, which makes your reaction so much more difficult to comprehend.

 

I don't get the wooden spoon thing, nor the 10 men thing, and if you check the shoutbox you'll see the conversation about the cat. Why else would you write "Meow"?

 

You jump in far too quickly with assumptions, and your aggression in correspondence is unnecessary. I would guess you are fairly young judging by your tone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest blueboy122

BB, Why don't you read back, and realise you reacted over my asking why a conversation had gone from rainbow lace wearing footballers to lesbian porn? You yourself had questioned it, which makes your reaction so much more difficult to comprehend.

 

I don't get the wooden spoon thing, nor the 10 men thing, and if you check the shoutbox you'll see the conversation about the cat. Why else would you write "Meow"?

 

You jump in far too quickly with assumptions, and your aggression in correspondence is unnecessary. I would guess you are fairly young judging by your tone.

Don't need to read back, you have a vulgar condescending air about you and it should have been curbed when you were once yourself very young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I mention sex I'm just using that as an example. I'm not debating that some people have gay thoughts, what I'm saying is that it's un-natural to go and be a homosexual. Nature tells you that sex and relationships between a man and a woman is the normal way to go as that is the same for all species. All species reproduce with a male and female to reproduce.

 

It comes down to survival of the fittest. If 100% of the population was gay would we still be a species? No, because we wouldn't have any babies in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a fair point, weren't the Romans gay obviously not all... There is evidence of homosexuality dating back even before then.

 

 

then there's the ancient Greeks!

 

think in most cases it was a choice back then...women were used just as reproductive vessels really...men were seen as better class citizens so to have sex with a man was seen as more socially acceptable..that's what i read anyways

 

 

as for the gay marriage thing..shouldn't be allowed..as stated it's a religious thing..never sure why they'd want to get married in the eyes of a god that doesn't accept them to be honest

 

i don't believe in marriage because i don't believe in god..so to me it's a pointless act..but i also wouldn't expect to be allowed to get married if i wanted to but still didn't believe in god

Link to comment
Share on other sites

being gay isn't a choice, just like the colour of your skin isn't a choice. wearing the laces is no different to wearing kick racism out of football shirts... unless thats perceived as the promotion of being black?

 

In fairness, that's the narrative of our culture but it's not yet backed up genetically. I have little doubt, though, that it will be over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

simple yes / no question then mate; do GLBT people deserve equal rights?

 

Absolutely, yes. This demands tolerance from everyone. While I would argue that we can expect everyone to be tolerant and treat everyone with respect and dignity, we cannot demand that everyone accept. There's a big difference between tolerance and acceptance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...