Jump to content
IGNORED

Eliaquim Mangala


c1982

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Paddock said:

I’m not arguing any other point than what I’m stating. Allerdyce said in an interview we need a left footed centre half because we don’t have a single left footed defender available and that’s why he signed him and that’s why he is playing him because he feels it brings more balance to the team- whether that’s right or wrong is another matter but that is why he’s playing and our existing centre halves have hardly made making that decision a tough one.

You see that's where your argument breaks down, as Allerdyce and the truth, or in fact what we would call reality, are not acquainted with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, London Blue said:

You see that's where your argument breaks down, as Allerdyce and the truth, or in fact what we would call reality, are not acquainted with each other.

He has no need to lie about it though does he- he stated he wanted a left sided cb, he said why he wanted one, he got one so it’s an absolute knocking bet he’s going to play him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Paddock said:

Someones posted on Twitter he’s out for the season and going back to City.

That would be hilarious... take 2 windows to bring in a left sided player... one drubbing and 45 mins later he is out for the season! 

Let' just hope we won' be paying his wages!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said:

He's really not. I'd have had every single CB at the club before him, and that includes an injured Mori.

He's absolute garbage and it's done us a favour him getting injured, because it's guaranteed he'd have started every game until the end of the season.

Sorry, you said terrible....

Thats a step up for our defence. I would go with weak, indecisive, no heart, and no effort.

Anthing above that and the player must be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lowensda said:

Stuck with a crock now.

Not only did we not need him but now were paying for his rehabilitation and wages whilst he doesn't play.

That transfer alone Walsh should be sacked.

Indeed. Never rated him.  Should have never have come here. Only positive would be if it leads to the sacking of Walsh or Sam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...