Avinalaff Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 And you sir are very judgemental of people for someone who can be a very sensitive soul when people can be critical of him. Isn't there any relevance? Carragher stating that he would rather be bitten than have his legs broken? Well maybe he could have given Nani that option... I would rather be bitten by Sebastian Vettel than get hit by his car at 150 mph, not too sure Lewis Hamilton gets that option either though. Whats the common denominator here??? Your argument is absurd. Carragher made a statement that he would rather be bitten than have a broken leg. That is a personal opinion regarding his preferred choice of injury when compared. What ever he has done to others is totally irrelevant to his own preference. I also state I'd rather be bitten, and you then claim a totally different argument to that of Carragher to attempt to underline your point. In your own words: unfortunately a leg breaking tackle intentional or not has the grey area that it is conceivable that either opponent can mistime/lose balance. Why then do you not apply that to Carragher? You're starting to bore me with your determination to be correct, being more of a concern, than your determination to be rational. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 depends who bites you surely? i'd rather get a broken leg than catch some scummy disease...not really arsed anyways..10 games is fine by me..i have nothing to compare it with in the premier league so can't say if it's too harsh or not harsh enough..if you go off his previous bite that got him 7 games then it seems about right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 some liverpool fan blaming ivanovic on talksport Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 some liverpool fan blaming ivanovic on talksport How?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeO Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 some liverpool fan blaming ivanovic on talksport Give him a twelve game ban for looking tasty . Peter H 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 some liverpool fan blaming ivanovic on talksport They'll blame anything so that they don't have to blame themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 How?! koppite logic..apparently it's ivanovic's fault for complaining Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hafnia Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 One game per inch of tooth, it's fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 koppite logic..apparently it's ivanovic's fault for complaining So he was supposed to let Suarez bite him and not say a word? Fuck. Me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 brilliant innit..when i've woken up a bit i'm headin on over to rawk for some more logical arguments! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Whats the authorisation code at RAWK? Is it always the same or randomly generated? I can't be arsed spending 20 minutes e-mailing the admin just to go there on the wind up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcopaulo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 i never sign up..just linger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bailey Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Your argument is absurd. Carragher made a statement that he would rather be bitten than have a broken leg. That is a personal opinion regarding his preferred choice of injury when compared. What ever he has done to others is totally irrelevant to his own preference. Suarez's pure intent was to hurt Ivanovic by biting him. He was attempting to do nothing else apart from 'assault' Ivanovic and there is no dispute over that. If he had deliberately tried to brake Ivanovic's leg where there was no dispute over what his intentions were then I would expect him to be banned from football for life not just a few games. Suarez hasnt mistimed his challenge or anything like that, his sole intention was to hurt Ivanovic and that is why he deserves a lengthy ban, especially when you take into account his previous history with such events. The fact that he even tried to appeal that the incident should have been 3 games at the most has probably cost him even more games, as it shows that he has no understanding of the severity of what he has done. Romey 1878, Matt and Fearthainn 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Liverpool fans are always the victim. If any of Evertons players displayed that kind of behaviour id want him out of the club. Regardless of how good he was. Ive gone through the team in my head and id be happy if Everton sold anyone in the squad that displayed that kind of hunger. 10 games is fair. Fearthainn, Matt and Romey 1878 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 i never sign up..just linger You can find me on 'This is Anfield' instead. http://forums.thisisanfield.com/index.php?/topic/15863-suarez-banned-for-10-matches/page-7&do=findComment&comment=108237 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogsy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 (edited) Ha ha one guy says he's the 'third' best player in the world!!!!!???? Are they all just so deluded or is it me. Granted he is quality (when he isn't being a c#@t), but third best in the world? Edited April 24, 2013 by mogsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I laughed at that part. I would reply and tell him how it is but it's actually funny to have a conversation with someone as deluded as they are so I'll carry on pretending to be a red. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Suarez's pure intent was to hurt Ivanovic by biting him. He was attempting to do nothing else apart from 'assault' Ivanovic and there is no dispute over that. If he had deliberately tried to brake Ivanovic's leg where there was no dispute over what his intentions were then I would expect him to be banned from football for life not just a few games. Suarez hasnt mistimed his challenge or anything like that, his sole intention was to hurt Ivanovic and that is why he deserves a lengthy ban, especially when you take into account his previous history with such events. The fact that he even tried to appeal that the incident should have been 3 games at the most has probably cost him even more games, as it shows that he has no understanding of the severity of what he has done. Bailey, youre forgetting that in his homeland, grabbing a forearm with 2 hands and taking a chomp is considered a friendly custom, akin to that of bloodbrothers. Hes just been misunderstood again.... Bailey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogsy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 He's already dropping down the list to forth or fifth, at this rate he'll be out the top one hundred by bedtime!! Poor deluded sods! I am enjoying your posts on there Zoo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 He's already dropping down the list to forth or fifth, at this rate he'll be out the top one hundred by bedtime!! Poor deluded sods! I am enjoying your posts on there Zoo! Haha! Thanks mate . I'm loving how they're all adamant that Luis is being 'driven out of England un-fairly'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 from the BBC: Longest bans handed out by FA 9 months - Manchester United's Eric Cantona for 'kung-fu' kicking a supporter in 1995 9 months - Chelsea keeper Mark Bosnich who tested positive for cocaine in 2003 8 months - Rio Ferdinand of Manchester United for missing a drugs test in 2003 7 months - Sacked Chelsea striker Adrian Mutu for failing a drug test in 2004 12 games - QPR's Joey Barton for two counts of violent conduct against Manchester City players in 2012 11 games - Sheffield Wednesday's Paolo Di Canio for pushing referee Paul Alcock in 1998 10 games - Southampton's David Prutton for shoving referee Alan Wiley in 2005 10 games - Luis Suarez for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic in 2013 9 games - Paul Davis of Arsenal for punching Southampton's Glenn Cockerill in 1988 and breaking his jaw 8 games - Luis Suarez for racially abusing Patrice Evra in 2011 8 games - Man City's Ben Thatcher for elbowing Portsmouth's Pedro Mendes in 2006 How has pushing a referee over worse than racial abuse, biting someone... breaking someones jaw!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Because if you pushed a referee over and was given a 3 match ban people would be doing it all the time. By having a stupidly long ban for such a thing people think twice before doing it. I actually don't mind them putting such a long ban on it either, I like many others think that the standard of refereeing is piss poor but at least they have some control over the game. If every single fixture ended with the referee being pushed and abused then we wouldn't have a sport. We'd have a free-for-all each week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogsy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Haha! Thanks mate . I'm loving how they're all adamant that Luis is being 'driven out of England un-fairly'. Sell him for £10 million!!! I think I woke the whole street up laughing, brilliant!! And what's funnier is they are to dull to figure you out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalziel Kane Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Di Canio didn't push him over. I remember the incident like yesterday. All he did was give Alcock, or Brown, or whatever his name was, a very slight push, there was hardly any contact, and the referee put on this great thespian performance and it's more humorous than anything else. You can't even take it seriously. They should have charged the match official instead, for that fucking nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogsy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Sell him for £10 million!!! I think I woke the whole street up laughing, brilliant!! And what's funnier is they are to dull to figure you out! Oh wait they have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Oh wait they have It was fun while it lasted! Mogsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue 250 Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 from the BBC: How has pushing a referee over worse than racial abuse, biting someone... breaking someones jaw!? The ref was standing on the top of a multi-story car park at the time. Matt and Zoo 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Di Canio didn't push him over. I remember the incident like yesterday. All he did was give Alcock, or Brown, or whatever his name was, a very slight push, there was hardly any contact, and the referee put on this great thespian performance and it's more humorous than anything else. You can't even take it seriously. They should have charged the match official instead, for that fucking nonsense. simulation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogsy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 simulation? Christ how could you tell he was aroused from the experience?? Matt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Christ how could you tell he was aroused from the experience?? im going to assume thats a play on words Mogsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.