johnh Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 General Election called for June. Just surprised that its taken so long. It will be interesting to see if there is a 'Brexit' effect. Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Well, you know where you stand with her; she's consistently inconsistent on what she says. Or should it be, she's consistent at doing 180 degree turns on what she says. Quote
MikeO Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Well, you know where you stand with her; she's consistently inconsistent on what she says. Or should it be, she's consistent at doing 180 degree turns on what she says. Vote for me and you'll get exactly the opposite of everything I say . Matt 1 Quote
holystove Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Are you two standing in the way of the country coming together? :shaking fist: Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Vote for me and you'll get exactly the opposite of everything I say . I've just been looking back at some of her u-turns/contradictions. 1- Gordon Brown has no democratic mandate after Tony Blair resigns. Takes over from Cameron... 2- Remain voter, Leave bulldozer 3- No early GE... Launches a GE 4- National insurance 5- Hinkley Point That's after 5 minutes of google.... Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Are you two standing in the way of the country coming together? :shaking fist: I'm not allowed a voice, so I'll just shout on the side Quote
johnh Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Posted April 18, 2017 'When the facts change I change my mind.' John Maynard Keynes Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) 'When the facts change I change my mind.' John Maynard Keynes Shouldn't make such brazen statements to start with then Let's not pretend that she's doing this for anything other than her own gain thoguh Edited April 18, 2017 by Matt Quote
Sibdane Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 So what exactly does this mean? I'm not familiar with a leader calling for a general election -- a general election for what? Quote
MikeO Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 So what exactly does this mean? I'm not familiar with a leader calling for a general election -- a general election for what? The entire government. Quote
Formby Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Let's not pretend that she's doing this for anything other than her own gain thoguh Which politician doesn't? Which politician hasn't changed their mind? Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Which politician doesn't? Which politician hasn't changed their mind? Very true, but the amount of time she's about-faced in the last 12 months is staggering Quote
Bill Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 She's playing it smart, she knows there is nobody out there who can put up any sort of challenge, Corbin most definitely won't. She wants everybody singing from the same hymn sheet so there is a smoother exit from brexit. I can see where she's coming from. Quote
holystove Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 (edited) She's playing it smart, she knows there is nobody out there who can put up any sort of challenge, Corbin most definitely won't. She wants everybody singing from the same hymn sheet so there is a smoother exit from brexit. I can see where she's coming from. I agree on the smooth exit pov. A much bigger majority and she'll no longer be hostage of the far right wing of her party who demand hard brexit asap. She'll have freedom to compromise with other member states now and will only have to justify herself in 2022. No opposition party is a definite bonus. Does seem opportunistic though. the whole point of the Fixed-Term parliament act was to prevent PMs from calling a general election based on polls. Theresa May did just that. Edited April 18, 2017 by holystove Quote
rubecula Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 There you go folks, if you want to remain in EU, vote for the Lib Dems and get another referendum. Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 There you go folks, if you want to remain in EU, vote for the Lib Dems and get another referendum. If I could, I would. But, like Bill said, May has been very clever in her timing and planning - there's no chance the outcome is anything but a Conservative win Quote
johnh Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Posted April 18, 2017 She still requires the support of 2/3rds of MP's to hold the election. Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 She still requires the support of 2/3rds of MP's to hold the election. Do you think she's doing this without having a very good idea that it'll go ahead? Quote
pete0 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 I've just been looking back at some of her u-turns/contradictions. 1- Gordon Brown has no democratic mandate after Tony Blair resigns. Takes over from Cameron... 2- Remain voter, Leave bulldozer 3- No early GE... Launches a GE 4- National insurance 5- Hinkley Point That's after 5 minutes of google.... Almost everything in her first speech as well. Quote
Romey 1878 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 There you go folks, if you want to remain in EU, vote for the Lib Dems and get another referendum. I'd vote Conservative before I'd vote for that shower. The scrote that is Tim Farron just wants to hold referendums until he gets the result he wants. rubecula 1 Quote
markjazzbassist Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 i don't get it. i thought your system she's prime minister already and continues to hold that position until the coalition in parliment dissolves, then new partnerships are created and a vote is taken then. has parliment dissolved? why hold an election when she's already PM? Quote
Palfy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 I'd vote Conservative before I'd vote for that shower. The scrote that is Tim Farron just wants to hold referendums until he gets the result he wants.Sounds good to me anyway quite like yellow. MikeO 1 Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 i don't get it. i thought your system she's prime minister already and continues to hold that position until the coalition in parliment dissolves, then new partnerships are created and a vote is taken then. has parliment dissolved? why hold an election when she's already PM? because she wasn't voted in, she inherited the leadership once Cameron chickened out of his responsibilities Quote
Romey 1878 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 because she wasn't voted in, she inherited the leadership once Cameron chickened out of his responsibilities Neither was Cameron, we vote for a party and not a person. Quote
Palfy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Neither was Cameron, we vote for a party and not a person.Can't remember hearing the party having a say on the election. Her own MPs never had a clue. Quote
johnh Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Posted April 18, 2017 i don't get it. i thought your system she's prime minister already and continues to hold that position until the coalition in parliment dissolves, then new partnerships are created and a vote is taken then. has parliment dissolved? why hold an election when she's already PM? Mark, the real reason is that,currently, she (the Conservatives) have a very small majority in the House of Commons. With Labour in such disarray, she is now confident that the Conservatives will win with a large majority. This will kill two birds with one stone. First, she will be voted in as PM. Second, she will have a large majority and therefore an ability to introduce policies without fear of being outvoted. Sibdane and markjazzbassist 2 Quote
MikeO Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Mark, the real reason is that,currently, she (the Conservatives) have a very small majority in the House of Commons. With Labour in such disarray, she is now confident that the Conservatives will win with a large majority. This will kill two birds with one stone. First, she will be voted in as PM. Second, she will have a large majority and therefore an ability to introduce policies without fear of being outvoted. Was about to post similar, she's doing it to strengthen her position and (sadly) it definitely will. markjazzbassist 1 Quote
markjazzbassist Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 thanks john and mike i get it now. Quote
Matt Posted April 18, 2017 Report Posted April 18, 2017 Neither was Cameron, we vote for a party and not a person.people should vote for a party, but that's not always the case. I won't go further because I'll mix up topics... Anyway, John summed it up. MikeO 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.