Jump to content
IGNORED

Andriy Yarmolenko


Recommended Posts

There is no release clause for him that is why they can turn it down. If there was they are powerless to stop him going. We meet the clause he agrees terms and there is fuck all the selling club can do.

 

For the last time, we wont sign him and there is no release clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no release clause for him that is why they can turn it down. If there was they are powerless to stop him going. We meet the clause he agrees terms and there is fuck all the selling club can do.

 

For the last time, we wont sign him and there is no release clause.

It takes but two minutes to see that he has Pad there's multiple interviews and articles on it

 

It could be that we haven't met the clause or there could be some form of stipulation in it that it has to be to a CL club etc hence why their tit of a chairman is playing hardball but all the evidence suggests he DOES have a clause in his contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes but two minutes to see that he has Pad there's multiple interviews and articles on it

 

It could be that we haven't met the clause or there could be some form of stipulation in it that it has to be to a CL club etc hence why their tit of a chairman is playing hardball but all the evidence suggests he DOES have a clause in his contract

1 fucking Twitter account - futbol Ukraine. Been winding stoke fans up etc etc. That's the only source saying it was a disclosure agreement. He shares the same agent as lukaku, I'm sure the club know quite clearly what is going on

 

With a fee agreed there can be othernegotiations as in amount up front, sell on fees etc.

Edited by Hafnia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes but two minutes to see that he has Pad there's multiple interviews and articles on it

 

It could be that we haven't met the clause or there could be some form of stipulation in it that it has to be to a CL club etc hence why their tit of a chairman is playing hardball but all the evidence suggests he DOES have a clause in his contract

He had a clause he then extended his contract by a year and the clause was written out. All the Ukrainian news outlets say it if u can be arsed trying to translate the fuckers.

 

If he had a clause the club would be powerless to stop him Paul they cannot stop s transfer if a club meet a clause it's why he never went to Stoke, the owner never deemed them good enough, if there was a clause he could not stop that yet he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had a clause he then extended his contract by a year and the clause was written out. All the Ukrainian news outlets say it if u can be arsed trying to translate the fuckers.

 

If he had a clause the club would be powerless to stop him Paul they cannot stop s transfer if a club meet a clause it's why he never went to Stoke, the owner never deemed them good enough, if there was a clause he could not stop that yet he did.

That bit makes me chuckle. This chairman is either whacky or in some strange way wanting the best for the player. Ha. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...