Jump to content
IGNORED

Vitaliy Mykolenko


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, RuffRob said:

One thing I am pretty sure of is Digne will be desperate to go to this summers World Cup - he missed it 4 years ago when France won it. He know this summer will be his last chance. Digne does have his own personal agenda of why he would like play this season to continue to be channelled through him, in the hope his form rapidly improves in the second half of the season and he is on the plane and potentially even first choice LB. He will not want to be on Everton's bench.

 

If he’s not sold or backed down and we land Mykolenko he doesn’t even make the bench.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Palfy said:

I understand the FFP rules, but when a player says he wants to leave you have to get a replacement in. Mykolenko if available will be coming here whether Digne has departed or not, ideally you would want Digne to have gone early in the same transfer window. So I would say it isn’t bad business but necessary business and on this occasion we haven’t been forced to sell because we want to buy. Digne could be very picky in where he wants to go so may not get the move he wants, so if we can get a replacement very early Digne loses a lot of cards he’s holding, because the club can say if you don’t except offers from the likes of Newcastle and your favoured clubs don’t come in you will not be making the squad here, and will soon become a forgotten man. It takes a strong club and management to do that and I believe we now have a stronger club with Ancelotti and Brand’s gone.  

Do you? Could you explain them please? Not being funny, but seems everyone has their own interpretation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Matt said:

Do you? Could you explain them please? Not being funny, but seems everyone has their own interpretation.

Is this a prelude for you being able to shoot me down , the easiest thing to do is read the article posted in the Echo less than a week ago out lining the FFP rules, that’s what I did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Palfy said:

I understand the FFP rules, but when a player says he wants to leave you have to get a replacement in. Mykolenko if available will be coming here whether Digne has departed or not, ideally you would want Digne to have gone early in the same transfer window. So I would say it isn’t bad business but necessary business and on this occasion we haven’t been forced to sell because we want to buy. Digne could be very picky in where he wants to go so may not get the move he wants, so if we can get a replacement very early Digne loses a lot of cards he’s holding, because the club can say if you don’t except offers from the likes of Newcastle and your favoured clubs don’t come in you will not be making the squad here, and will soon become a forgotten man. It takes a strong club and management to do that and I believe we now have a stronger club with Ancelotti and Brand’s gone.  

I think that is a very good point. Anything that puts the club and the manager in a strong position in this situation has to be a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Matt said:

Do you? Could you explain them please? Not being funny, but seems everyone has their own interpretation.

I don't think even the clubs fully understand them, I read that Everton had to check with the power that be to see how close there are of if they are likely be be broken, and there are two forms of them,  Premier league ones and UEFA ones, and them you have a COVID adjustment. Which might kick in again as some European countries now not letting fans in grounds again. It a mine field. 

I think its probably safe to say that we are probably pretty close to falling foul of them given our big spending coupled with limited revenue streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Palfy said:

Is this a prelude for you being able to shoot me down , the easiest thing to do is read the article posted in the Echo less than a week ago out lining the FFP rules, that’s what I did. 

Not at all, it's a genuine question! Thought I'd made that clear, but to reiterate I'm honestly interested to hear your interpretation. 

 

38 minutes ago, RuffRob said:

I don't think even the clubs fully understand them, I read that Everton had to check with the power that be to see how close there are of if they are likely be be broken, and there are two forms of them,  Premier league ones and UEFA ones, and them you have a COVID adjustment. Which might kick in again as some European countries now not letting fans in grounds again. It a mine field. 

I think its probably safe to say that we are probably pretty close to falling foul of them given our big spending coupled with limited revenue streams.

That's my feeling too. Think FFP is a good idea but it was implemented too fast without any real consideration of potential impacts and loopholes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies Matt for doubting your post. FFP was designed to try and stop teams getting into debts they can’t repay, and to stop asset stripping by owners, whether it works is a different story. UEFA are currently in court battles with teams who have been accused of breaking the rules which I believe has forced them to water down the rules, which means you can break the rules on money spent to income over multiple seasons before serious punishments are administered, such as larger fines, points deducted or being removed from competitions. You can also appeal against any judgment being found against you if you believe you have mitigating circumstances. Hence my reply to Steve saying the purchase of Mykolenko is a bad deal and that we can’t buy unless we sell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Matt said:

Not at all, it's a genuine question! Thought I'd made that clear, but to reiterate I'm honestly interested to hear your interpretation. 

 

That's my feeling too. Think FFP is a good idea but it was implemented too fast without any real consideration of potential impacts and loopholes. 

my overriding issue with FFP is that it now essentially protects those clubs who where 'lucky' enough to get massive cash injections 10-20 years ago and effectively penalises those clubs that didn't. To me it is the most significant ruling that has ever been brought in to the game and has influenced who are not considered the top teams like nothing else, and continually offers them protection. 

Its like going in to at half time 1-0 down off a fluky deflection but then the rules of the game changing - the team who are a goal up can put a 12th player on (to represent your CL etc earnings) and the team who are one goal down has to take a player off (as you now have limits on what you can spend related to turnover). It hard to come back in a game with these rules.

At least let the losing teams keep 11 players on the pitch!!!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a business man, so will not be offended if anyone calls me incorrect, but my interpretation of the Digne situation is this.

Digne wants to leave, thus automatically devaluing him as other clubs understand he may put pressure on the board to go. This won't always be the case as fundamentally the club make the final decision, but this surly is a factor for the buying club to negotiate.

Further to this a replacement is already through the door (or so we think). Another negotiating factor for other clubs who will know our FFP 'wiggle room' and want to take advantage of this. They will understand we need to sell to raise funds otherwise face fines.

One more factor maybe that Rafa sees Digne as a player who does not fit into his style of play. He no longer becomes a key player for us and the argument of his importance to the squad is lost during negotiations.

The only valuation we have of him is the quality he's shown over the past few years and the 3.5 years he has remaining on his current deal.

I'd be surprised if we gained more than £25m for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Aidan said:

I'm not a business man, so will not be offended if anyone calls me incorrect, but my interpretation of the Digne situation is this.

Digne wants to leave, thus automatically devaluing him as other clubs understand he may put pressure on the board to go. This won't always be the case as fundamentally the club make the final decision, but this surly is a factor for the buying club to negotiate.

Further to this a replacement is already through the door (or so we think). Another negotiating factor for other clubs who will know our FFP 'wiggle room' and want to take advantage of this. They will understand we need to sell to raise funds otherwise face fines.

One more factor maybe that Rafa sees Digne as a player who does not fit into his style of play. He no longer becomes a key player for us and the argument of his importance to the squad is lost during negotiations.

The only valuation we have of him is the quality he's shown over the past few years and the 3.5 years he has remaining on his current deal.

I'd be surprised if we gained more than £25m for him.

but counter to that is - the age old 'supply and demand'. There are not that may good players in supply in January and there seems to be a demand by more than one club. Digne is also not cup ties for playing in Europe. Once you have more than one club interested, then any single club loses a lot of negotiating bargain chips. 

A replacement lined up means Digne faces being on the bench at Everton if he does not move to a club that we are willing to sell him to. He will not want to be on the bench on the run up to what might be his last chance to play in a world cup. 

I don't think Mykolenko deal hinges on Digne sale, but a Digne sale may also allow another one or two to come in January. 

£25M is probably not far of the mark of what he is worth, as whoever buys him will take on his hefty wages as well. I think we get a better deal selling him now than in the summer though. If he stays until the end of August that's also another £3.5M in wages spent!!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RuffRob said:

but counter to that is - the age old 'supply and demand'. There are not that may good players in supply in January and there seems to be a demand by more than one club. Digne is also not cup ties for playing in Europe. Once you have more than one club interested, then any single club loses a lot of negotiating bargain chips. 

A replacement lined up means Digne faces being on the bench at Everton if he does not move to a club that we are willing to sell him to. He will not want to be on the bench on the run up to what might be his last chance to play in a world cup. 

I don't think Mykolenko deal hinges on Digne sale, but a Digne sale may also allow another one or two to come in January. 

£25M is probably not far of the mark of what he is worth, as whoever buys him will take on his hefty wages as well. I think we get a better deal selling him now than in the summer though. If he stays until the end of August that's also another £3.5M in wages spent!!  

Agree. An on form Digne, played to his strengths, is a powerful player for any team. He has not been firing on all cylinders for some time now though and this pre dates Rafa becoming manager. Sadly, Everton just can't accommodate Digne in the style he wants to be played so an amicable parting of the ways makes good personal and business sense imho for both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Palfy said:

Apologies Matt for doubting your post. FFP was designed to try and stop teams getting into debts they can’t repay, and to stop asset stripping by owners, whether it works is a different story. UEFA are currently in court battles with teams who have been accused of breaking the rules which I believe has forced them to water down the rules, which means you can break the rules on money spent to income over multiple seasons before serious punishments are administered, such as larger fines, points deducted or being removed from competitions. You can also appeal against any judgment being found against you if you believe you have mitigating circumstances. Hence my reply to Steve saying the purchase of Mykolenko is a bad deal and that we can’t buy unless we sell. 

No worries. And no disrespect but that's why it is and not how it works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bailey said:

I guess this will go down as a Brands signing when it happens. Hopefully it works.

It is interesting to read that Mykolenko was a player both Benitez and Brands agreed on. If they had BOTH been looking at a £20m LB was there already a plan to cash in on Digne in the next 12-18month. The 'fallout' simply excelerating the process? Just a thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RuffRob said:

It is interesting to read that Mykolenko was a player both Benitez and Brands agreed on. If they had BOTH been looking at a £20m LB was there already a plan to cash in on Digne in the next 12-18month. The 'fallout' simply excelerating the process? Just a thought. 

I think it was probably just good 'succession planning'. 

Its safe to say the jury is out on Niels as he doesnt seem to have been fancied by Carlo or Benitez. 

I imagine they would have hoped that Digne could have passed on some of his experience before Mykolenko took over and Digne was moved on. 

Its a shame the other side of the pitch hasn't been as well considered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dunlopp9987 said:

I guess I'm glad to see he's not on massive wages, but £20m for someone coming from the Ukrainian league is a real gamble. Especially with our financial constraints.

Really hope he's something special, but I just worry over that fee

Id also say £50k per week for the same league is a big gamble!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bailey said:

Id also say £50k per week for the same league is a big gamble!

Are you completely discounting that he may have stood out when playing international and European football, as someone with the ability to go and become a very good player given the right opportunity. And I would remind you buying players from the top 3 or 4 leagues is no guarantee even if you are paying them between 100-200k a week. 
We have needed to find another way of doing our business so buying younger players on wages less than 50% plus of some of our senior players who haven’t repaid their costs is a better way forward imo, everything is a gamble whether it be managers or players, and in Benitez I believe we have a very calculated manager and he will make Mykolenko a real success as Gray is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bailey said:

Id also say £50k per week for the same league is a big gamble!

He is definately not cheap, the problem now is you simply have to pay these fees and wages for the best and most sort after youngsters around. This lad has been on the radar of some big clubs, lets hope we have caught them napping this january, sorry I mean December.

Pretty much all transfers are a gamble. Some just more so than others. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Palfy said:

Are you completely discounting that he may have stood out when playing international and European football, as someone with the ability to go and become a very good player given the right opportunity. And I would remind you buying players from the top 3 or 4 leagues is no guarantee even if you are paying them between 100-200k a week. 
We have needed to find another way of doing our business so buying younger players on wages less than 50% plus of some of our senior players who haven’t repaid their costs is a better way forward imo, everything is a gamble whether it be managers or players, and in Benitez I believe we have a very calculated manager and he will make Mykolenko a real success as Gray is. 

Lots of players stand out in internationals but it doesnt make them good players.

He might turn out to be very good but its hard to judge him in that league. Not many come over and stand out over here. Even less come over and hit the ground running. He could be the one though.

It may turn out to be a cheap deal but when you consider Digne had played at the very highest level, cost less in transfer fee and not that much more in wages (relatively speaking). 

This is a signing that Brands has had a big say in as he was scouted well before Benitez arrived according to reports.

I have had a little look at videos of him and I actually think he looks quite decent. In that league he looks pretty strong and quick. He has good size about him too. He has enough about him to beat a man at that level and he has the technique to whip in a decent enough cross too. I certainly think he is too good for that league but whether he does that in the Premier League I'm not so sure where players are stronger, quicker and smarter. It depends on how he adapts.

My one concern would be that I think he could end up seeing a few bookings whilst he settles in as he seems to like going off his feet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bailey said:

Lots of players stand out in internationals but it doesnt make them good players.

He might turn out to be very good but its hard to judge him in that league. Not many come over and stand out over here. Even less come over and hit the ground running. He could be the one though.

It may turn out to be a cheap deal but when you consider Digne had played at the very highest level, cost less in transfer fee and not that much more in wages (relatively speaking). 

This is a signing that Brands has had a big say in as he was scouted well before Benitez arrived according to reports.

I have had a little look at videos of him and I actually think he looks quite decent. In that league he looks pretty strong and quick. He has good size about him too. He has enough about him to beat a man at that level and he has the technique to whip in a decent enough cross too. I certainly think he is too good for that league but whether he does that in the Premier League I'm not so sure where players are stronger, quicker and smarter. It depends on how he adapts.

My one concern would be that I think he could end up seeing a few bookings whilst he settles in as he seems to like going off his feet. 

The league thing is confusing me slightly if your analogy of leagues and players is correct shouldn’t James be setting the world on fire In Qatar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Palfy said:

The league thing is confusing me slightly if your analogy of leagues and players is correct shouldn’t James be setting the world on fire In Qatar. 

If he gave a shit then yes, like he did in the Premier League.

Do you think players doing well in one league at a lower level can translate the same level of form into a tougher league? 

18 hours ago, Matt said:

£50k in the Premier League is probably entry level for most clubs nowadays.

It depends where they come from. A quick look at Sportac for Leicester shows the following players were bought at less than £50k.

Fofana £19k

Tielemans £33k

Soyuncu £45k

Perez £45k

Looking at West Ham there is:

Benhrama £23k

Coufal £30k

(Unfortunately a lot of their other recent signings are unknown).

At Brighton only Lallana is reported to be on more than Mykolenko is going to be on.

At Wolves you have a raft of players including Neto, Neves, Traore & Jimenez that are on less. 

I actually find it a bit shocking how much we pay on wages compared to other clubs at our level!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bailey said:

If he gave a shit then yes, like he did in the Premier League.

Do you think players doing well in one league at a lower level can translate the same level of form into a tougher league? 

It depends where they come from. A quick look at Sportac for Leicester shows the following players were bought at less than £50k.

Fofana £19k

Tielemans £33k

Soyuncu £45k

Perez £45k

Looking at West Ham there is:

Benhrama £23k

Coufal £30k

(Unfortunately a lot of their other recent signings are unknown).

At Brighton only Lallana is reported to be on more than Mykolenko is going to be on.

At Wolves you have a raft of players including Neto, Neves, Traore & Jimenez that are on less. 

I actually find it a bit shocking how much we pay on wages compared to other clubs at our level!

But we are not trying to be at our level that's why we are paying more unfortunately we keep getting it wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bailey said:

If he gave a shit then yes, like he did in the Premier League.

Do you think players doing well in one league at a lower level can translate the same level of form into a tougher league? 

It depends where they come from. A quick look at Sportac for Leicester shows the following players were bought at less than £50k.

Fofana £19k

Tielemans £33k

Soyuncu £45k

Perez £45k

Looking at West Ham there is:

Benhrama £23k

Coufal £30k

(Unfortunately a lot of their other recent signings are unknown).

At Brighton only Lallana is reported to be on more than Mykolenko is going to be on.

At Wolves you have a raft of players including Neto, Neves, Traore & Jimenez that are on less. 

I actually find it a bit shocking how much we pay on wages compared to other clubs at our level!

No I don’t think all players that are doing well in lower leagues will replicate the same in a higher league, as not all players in highest leagues doing well will not always replicate the same form in lower leagues. Mykolenko has been looked at by a few clubs because he’s playing well fuck all to do with playing in a lower league and all to do with he has what it takes to be a very good player in any league, most players in higher leagues cut their teeth in lower teams or lower leagues, and the youngsters like him who show they have ability get snapped up by the better team’s in higher leagues, always has been that way and always will be, then they become the player you are only interested in buying 40 million and 140k a week, and still no guarantee they will be any good. Still don’t get your league thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Palfy said:

No I don’t think all players that are doing well in lower leagues will replicate the same in a higher league, as not all players in highest leagues doing well will not always replicate the same form in lower leagues. Mykolenko has been looked at by a few clubs because he’s playing well fuck all to do with playing in a lower league and all to do with he has what it takes to be a very good player in any league, most players in higher leagues cut their teeth in lower teams or lower leagues, and the youngsters like him who show they have ability get snapped up by the better team’s in higher leagues, always has been that way and always will be, then they become the player you are only interested in buying 40 million and 140k a week, and still no guarantee they will be any good. Still don’t get your league thing?

I think his “league thing” is that it’s a big risk buying players from a poor quality league for a lot of money. To be fair we’ve been burned with Biliyaletdinov (I’m positive I’ve not spelt that correctly) and Niasse who both didn’t cut it, so I get the concern. 
I hope we’ve unearthed a gem though, but for £20m (ish) he better be as we can’t afford the losses anymore. 
 

To add to this, we bought what was one of the best players in the Dutch league in Klassen and he was an absolute flop. But then Liverpool bought the best in the Dutch league in Suarez and he was unbelievable. It’s very tough to call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, StevO said:

I think his “league thing” is that it’s a big risk buying players from a poor quality league for a lot of money. To be fair we’ve been burned with Biliyaletdinov (I’m positive I’ve not spelt that correctly) and Niasse who both didn’t cut it, so I get the concern. 
I hope we’ve unearthed a gem though, but for £20m (ish) he better be as we can’t afford the losses anymore. 
 

To add to this, we bought what was one of the best players in the Dutch league in Klassen and he was an absolute flop. But then Liverpool bought the best in the Dutch league in Suarez and he was unbelievable. It’s very tough to call. 

We’ve also bought players who have performed in some of the best leagues in Europe and they haven’t performed for us, for me this isn’t a league issue it’s all about will the player fit into the team and the managers tactics not what league or where you come from. I’d like to think the way forward is to buy players with a plan no matter where they come from, the buying of the big names on big fees and even bigger wages has been our down fall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BedfordBlue said:

But we are not trying to be at our level that's why we are paying more unfortunately we keep getting it wrong 

Thats where we need to check ourselves. We aren't a fringe Europe side. We are mid table and all those sides around us are aiming higher too. We don't need to pay more than anyone else.

2 hours ago, Palfy said:

No I don’t think all players that are doing well in lower leagues will replicate the same in a higher league, as not all players in highest leagues doing well will not always replicate the same form in lower leagues. Mykolenko has been looked at by a few clubs because he’s playing well fuck all to do with playing in a lower league and all to do with he has what it takes to be a very good player in any league, most players in higher leagues cut their teeth in lower teams or lower leagues, and the youngsters like him who show they have ability get snapped up by the better team’s in higher leagues, always has been that way and always will be, then they become the player you are only interested in buying 40 million and 140k a week, and still no guarantee they will be any good. Still don’t get your league thing?

Lots of players in the Championship get bought for big fees and go nowhere. Then you get someone like Vardy who comes from nowhere to being an England player. The former is much more common than the latter. I agree that it should be based on the player and not everyone in a league should be tarnished with the same brush, but even if he is good enough for this league, he will have to be bloody good to be better than Digne and I expect he will take time to settle into this league. 

The league thing is that we have to be careful with our money and we are essentially swapping a French international who has been one of the best full backs in the league for the last few seasons to a complete unknown quality for what is reported to be not too dissimilar money. 

 

32 minutes ago, Palfy said:

We’ve also bought players who have performed in some of the best leagues in Europe and they haven’t performed for us, for me this isn’t a league issue it’s all about will the player fit into the team and the managers tactics not what league or where you come from. I’d like to think the way forward is to buy players with a plan no matter where they come from, the buying of the big names on big fees and even bigger wages has been our down fall. 

I am sure those big names also came with a plan too. If he doesnt cut the mustard, do you think he will be easy to sell on at almost £60k per week wages given what I have said about other sides in the league? Tosun, a proven Champions League and International goalscorer is on less and can't be sold on, albeit with a different age profile.

Lets just hope it works out so this conversation doesn't matter! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bailey said:

I am sure those big names also came with a plan too. If he doesnt cut the mustard, do you think he will be easy to sell on at almost £60k per week wages given what I have said about other sides in the league? Tosun, a proven Champions League and International goalscorer is on less and can't be sold on, albeit with a different age profile.

Lets just hope it works out so this conversation doesn't matter! 

That is one of the concerns with this sort of signing. If it doesn’t work out the only place he’s going is back to the Ukrainian league and there’s no chance they’ll pay anywhere near £20m to take him back and we’ll be left with another Tosun situation.

But, this is the type of game we’re going to have to play - high risk with the potential for a high reward. We’re certainly looking at the right profile of player this window it seems and we just have to hope we can have more hits than misses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Palfy said:

We’ve also bought players who have performed in some of the best leagues in Europe and they haven’t performed for us, for me this isn’t a league issue it’s all about will the player fit into the team and the managers tactics not what league or where you come from. I’d like to think the way forward is to buy players with a plan no matter where they come from, the buying of the big names on big fees and even bigger wages has been our down fall. 

Completely agree. I’d always rather players we have improve than buy a player. Every transfer is a risk. It’s just an assumed lower risk with players who are tried and tested at a higher level, but as you said, doesn’t always work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d have liked this to be announced already if it is, as per the reports, already completed. Just show the fan base we aren’t wasting time, we are on the front foot and doing business early. There is nothing stopping them other than New Everton still being Old Everton. 
They could have him holding his shirt with his squad number and everything. Just because the registration can’t be completed until next week doesn’t stop them telling us it’s all agreed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assumed when this lad was named as a Ukranian international that he was playing regularly. 

As far as I can see from transfermarkt he played 21 mins in 2018.  He didnt even make the match day squad for the three qualifiers before it. 

I also thought he was a young lad breaking through the ranks but he has played over 11,500 minutes of mens football, the equivalent of over 127 games of 90 minutes. 

I then thought I would try and check some of the highlights of his CL games. This is one he will want to forget:

 

Poor for their first goal in this as well:

He shows some nice vision in this one with a pass in the build up to their goal but defensively soft again:

 

Watching these games compared to the other videos he looks averagely paced and not as strong. He has also played as a centre half in Ukraine but he wont be able to do that here.

He looks like he has some ability on the ball but I am very concerned that he is missing some real basics in his defending. I suppose that is a lot easier to coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bailey said:

I assumed when this lad was named as a Ukranian international that he was playing regularly. 

As far as I can see from transfermarkt he played 21 mins in 2018.  He didnt even make the match day squad for the three qualifiers before it. 

I also thought he was a young lad breaking through the ranks but he has played over 11,500 minutes of mens football, the equivalent of over 127 games of 90 minutes. 

I then thought I would try and check some of the highlights of his CL games. This is one he will want to forget:

 

Poor for their first goal in this as well:

He shows some nice vision in this one with a pass in the build up to their goal but defensively soft again:

 

Watching these games compared to the other videos he looks averagely paced and not as strong. He has also played as a centre half in Ukraine but he wont be able to do that here.

He looks like he has some ability on the ball but I am very concerned that he is missing some real basics in his defending. I suppose that is a lot easier to coach. 

Just as well looking at a you tube highlight real as looking at CL game highlight againt european giants. Game highlight reals are not going to focus on stuff a LB does well againts some of the worlds better offensive players. Benfica, Barca and Bayen don't play ordinary players. 

I am not going to worry just yet. 

I have no doubt it will take a young Ukrainian lad a bit of time to adjust to a new counrty and the cut and thrust of the premier league.

No point in being down on him before he even puts the shirt on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RuffRob said:

Just as well looking at a you tube highlight real as looking at CL game highlight againt european giants. Game highlight reals are not going to focus on stuff a LB does well againts some of the worlds better offensive players. Benfica, Barca and Bayen don't play ordinary players. 

I am not going to worry just yet. 

I have no doubt it will take a young Ukrainian lad a bit of time to adjust to a new counrty and the cut and thrust of the premier league.

No point in being down on him before he even puts the shirt on. 

Of course you can. 

Its no comment on his overall game as he is barely involved in the highlights but he makes mistakes he shouldn't be making. 

You clearly can't judge his overall game but you can still see bits about him and you can compare him to those he is playing against.

It's not about being up or down on a player, it is just about trying to objectively assess what you see. You might not have guessed, but I am not one for hype! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m glad we got a new, young LB in, and I hope we use him this time. Aren’t we still going to need another one though? We needed one when Digne was playing. Now that he essentially seems to be frozen out, we’re back to having one natural LB. 
 

I don’t see us getting another one in, so I hope this guy is up to it or we’ll be seeing Godfrey there some more until Nkoukou comes back, and there’s no guarantee he’s good enough either yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AlbanyNYToffee said:

Can someone confirm if this is the first time we have officially signed someone on the opening day of a transfer window? It feels so damn good to have a target and get it done with urgency. 

Not 100% sure if it is the first time ever but it is certainly the first time in a long time. Hate or love Benitez, he is ruffling the right feathers, getting things done and building his own squad. As a consequence, we now have a sense of purpose, direction and belief. In short, we are being properly lead rather than being wastefully run by a committee.

Lovely to see and long may it continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RPG said:

Not 100% sure if it is the first time ever but it is certainly the first time in a long time. Hate or love Benitez, he is ruffling the right feathers, getting things done and building his own squad. As a consequence, we now have a sense of purpose, direction and belief. In short, we are being properly lead rather than being wastefully run by a committee.

Lovely to see and long may it continue.

I think it is still early days yet but I am eternally optimistic.

I think with this window and the next in the summer - when we see a huge amount wiped off the annual accounts as the amortisation and wages of Delph, Gyfi and Tosun disappearing. If you add Digne to this, then I see that as around £40M a year off the annual accounts, this is significant.

OK, these players will need replacing - but I am sure we can get more value out of this £40M a year. With his £17M fee (which I believe also includes add-on's) and reported £50,000 wages - Mykolenko is going to cost around £6.5M a year on our accounts - so some basic maths that we should be able to accommodate around 5 more similar signings to come on board over the next couple of windows. This is based on the assumption that we are able to spend what we now save!! add to this the sale of any other players al la Holgate etc - we could see a very different squad going in to 2023.   This to me what I will be measuring Rafa against in roughly 12 months time, I want to see a young energetic and hungry team/squad that is developing and looks to be going places. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...