Jump to content
IGNORED

Allan


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, chicagoblue said:

If Gana comes in I'd let him go.ย  He's on good wages.ย  Bring in a prospect/cheaper option near deadline day if we need more cover.ย 

Yeah, Iโ€™m in agreement. I had forgotten about him, and I canโ€™t say that Iโ€™ve thought about his role in our current setup. Heโ€™s a good player, but not one thatโ€™s a big miss obviously.ย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Btay said:

We have Doucoure, Garner & Davies as cover. I still think Allan has a bit to offer & would like to see him in this midfield we have going now. However, itโ€™s clear Frank wants a certain level of athleticism/energy in the middle of the park.

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, the reality is that it would take something catastrophic for him to start now. A solid if somewhat slow player doesn't really fit anymore. Good luck to him.ย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Matt said:

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, the reality is that it would take something catastrophic for him to start now. A solid if somewhat slow player doesn't really fit anymore. Good luck to him.ย 

I agree somewhat but I feel he makes up for his lack of pace with other areas of him game.

Garry Barry has to be one of the most physically disadvantaged players I have ever seen but he was an excellent player. Merely a comparison as they are two different players. Even Barry though, would have looked horrible in our midfield the last few years with how exposed he would have been..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aside finances, we do not want players on ยฃ100k a week who arenโ€™t part of the plans. Itโ€™s a bad culture creator. ย Last season we had 5/6 players earning half a million a week who werenโ€™t even contributing.ย 
ย 

when you have that and you core contributors are on half or even less of that it becomes an issue. Allan was a good lad just no legs anymoreย 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

Aside finances, we do not want players on ยฃ100k a week who arenโ€™t part of the plans. Itโ€™s a bad culture creator. ย Last season we had 5/6 players earning half a million a week who werenโ€™t even contributing.ย 
ย 

when you have that and you core contributors are on half or even less of that it becomes an issue. Allan was a good lad just no legs anymoreย 

We had/have players earning half a million a week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hafnia said:

Aside finances, we do not want players on ยฃ100k a week who arenโ€™t part of the plans. Itโ€™s a bad culture creator. ย Last season we had 5/6 players earning half a million a week who werenโ€™t even contributing.ย 
ย 

when you have that and you core contributors are on half or even less of that it becomes an issue. Allan was a good lad just no legs anymoreย 

I agree, not good having players on big money wages who don't play. It's good we are having a ruthless clear out on this front.

Let's see players earn good contracts.ย 

I don't think we will get any sort of fee for Allan, but if he not part of the plans, then no point in paying wages if we can get him of the bill.

Fair does to Allan for going to play in a much lesser league rather than sitting on a bench and enjoying the home comforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...